Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37879525›Full record

SynthesisClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2024

Prevalence of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma With and Without Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Bibek Saha, Kornpong Vantanasiri, Babu P Mohan, Rohit Goyal, Nikita Garg, Danielle Gerberi, John B Kisiel, Siddharth Singh, Prasad G Iyer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07335445 (Enhancing Screening Practices for Barrett's Esophagus), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07335445 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing Screening Practices for Barrett's Esophagus

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2026 to 2029Enrolled3,000ConditionsBarrett's EsophagusArmsScreening Reminder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. E-cigarette use and Barrett's esophagus: evaluating a new risk in the era of vaping.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. High Rates of Dysplasia in a Population-Based Analysis of "Incidental" Barrett's Esophagus.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Impact of Hiatus Hernia Size on Dysplasia Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Endoscopic Screening of Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bibek SahaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kornpong VantanasiriBarrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Babu P MohanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Rohit GoyalBarrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nikita GargBarrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Danielle GerberiMayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John B KisielBarrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Siddharth SinghDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Prasad G IyerBarrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: iyer.prasad@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Minimally Invasive Molecular Approaches for the Detection of Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal AdenocarcinomaR01CA241164 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Jagpreet Chhatwal, Prasad G. Iyer · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
Comparative effectiveness research in Hispanic patients with inflammatory bowel diseasesR01DK135937 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Siddharth Singh · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA241164NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK135937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAlthough gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms are an essential criterion for Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening in most gastroenterology society guidelines, a significant proportion of BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases do not endorse them. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to study the prevalence of BE/EAC in those with and without GERD.

methodsA systematic search was conducted through 5 major databases for studies reporting prevalence of BE/EAC in patients with and without GERD. Pooled proportions and odds ratios (ORs) of BE, long-segment BE, short-segment BE, dysplasia, and EAC in patients with and without GERD were synthesized.

resultsForty-three articles (12,883 patients with GERD; 51,350 patients without GERD) were included in the final analysis. BE prevalence was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8%-8.5%) and 2.2% (95% CI, 1.6%-3%) among individuals with and without GERD, respectively. EAC prevalence was 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-1%) and 0.1% (95% CI, 0%-0.2%) in those with and without GERD, respectively. The overall risks for BE (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.06-4.11) and long-segment BE (OR,4.17; 95% CI, 1.78-9.77) were higher in patients with GERD, but the risk for short-segment BE (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.89-3.52) did not differ between the two groups. In 9 population-based high-quality studies (2244 patients with GERD; 3724 patients without GERD), BE prevalence in patients without GERD was 4.9% (95% CI, 2.6%-9%). BE prevalence was highest in North American studies (10.6% [GERD] and 4.8% [non-GERD]).

conclusionsBE prevalence in those without GERD is substantial, particularly in large high-quality population-based studies. These data are important to factor in future BE/EAC early detection guidelines.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsGastroesophageal RefluxHumansPrevalenceEpidemiologyEsophageal CancerEsophageal NeoplasmGastroesophageal Reflux Complications

Identifiers

PMID37879525
PMCPMC11039569
OpenAlexW4387910993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.