Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37879316›Full record

SynthesisMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2024

The Potential of Bacteriophage Therapy as an Alternative Treatment Approach for Antibiotic-Resistant Infections.

Nike Walter, Mohammadali Mirzaei, Li Deng, Christian Willy, Volker Alt, Markus Rupp

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Microbiotherapy: an emerging adjunct for burn wound healing.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nike WalterDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Mohammadali MirzaeiHelmholtz Centre Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Virology, Munich, Germany.
Li DengInstitute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christian WillyDepartment Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Septic and Reconstructive Surgery, Research and Treatment Center Septic Defect Wounds, Federal Armed Forces of Germany, Military Academic Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Volker AltDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Markus RuppDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DEArmed Forces Hospital · SACenter for Environmental Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of the literature on the therapeutical application of bacteriophages.

methodsFirst, a bibliometric analysis was performed using the database Web of Science to determine annual number of publications and citations. Second, a systematic literature review was conducted on randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) of phage therapy in PubMed.

resultsOver the past decade, the number of publications on bacteriophage therapy increased more than fourfold with 212 articles in 2011 and 739 in 2022. The systematic search in PubMed yielded 7 RCTs eligible for inclusion, reporting on a total of 418 participants. Identified indications in this study included bacterial diarrhea, urinary tract infections, infected burn wounds, chronic otitis, chronic venous leg ulcers, and chronic rhinosinusitis. In three studies, mild to moderate adverse events were reported in 10/195 participants (5.1%). Three of the studies reported a statistically significant difference in outcomes comparing phage therapy with standard of care or placebo.

conclusionPhage therapy has gained increasing interest over the years. RCTs on different indications suggest the safety of phage therapy; however, reasons why phage therapy is not yet well accepted are limitations in the study designs. For a successful translation into clinical practice researchers and clinicians should learn from the earlier experiences and consider issues such as the quality of phage preparation, sensitivity testing, titer and dosages, as well as access to the infection site and stability for standardized protocols and future trials.

Indexed as

Phage TherapyBacterial InfectionsBacteriophagesBibliometricsDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBacteriophagesPhage therapyRandomized-controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID37879316
PMCPMC10896615
OpenAlexW4387950317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.