Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37879234›Full record

SynthesisESMO open2023

Safety of pregnancy after breast cancer in young women with hormone receptor-positive disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

L Arecco, E Blondeaux, M Bruzzone, M M Latocca, E Mariamidze, S Begijanashvili, E Sokolovic, G Gentile, G Scavone, S Ottonello and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in ESMO open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Estrogens and breast cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Early breast cancer in youngTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

L AreccoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/Lucarecco.
E BlondeauxU.O. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
M BruzzoneU.O. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
M M LatoccaDepartment of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova.
E MariamidzeDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Todua Clinic, Tbilisi.
S BegijanashviliDepartment of Clinical Oncology, American Hospital, Tbilisi, Georgia.
E SokolovicClinic of Oncology, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
G GentileMedical Oncology Unit B, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Pathology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome.
G ScavoneDepartment of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova.
S OttonelloDepartment of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova.
A BoutrosDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; Department of Medical Oncology, Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
I Vaz-LuisUnit 981-Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Interdisciplinary Department for the Organization of Patient Pathways (DIOPP), INSERM and Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France.
C SauraBreast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
R A AndersonMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
I DemeestereResearch Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Fertility Clinic (HUB-Erasme), Brussels, Belgium.
H A AzimBreast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
E de AzambujaAcademic Trials Promoting Team, Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium.
F A PeccatoriFertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
L Del MastroDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova.
A H PartridgeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
M LambertiniDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova. Electronic address: matteo.lambertini@unige.it.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITHospital Zambrano Hellion · MXInserm · FRMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Sarajevo · BAVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing evidence on the safety of pregnancy after anticancer treatments in breast cancer survivors, many physicians and patients remain concerned about a potential risk of pregnancy specifically in the case of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic literature search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane library with no language or date restriction up to 31 March 2023 was carried out. To be included, articles had to be retrospective and prospective case-control and cohort studies as well as clinical trials comparing survival outcomes of premenopausal women with or without a pregnancy after prior diagnosis of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were the outcomes of interest. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (n. CRD42023394232).

resultsOut of 7796 screened studies, 8 were eligible to be included in the final analysis. A total of 3805 patients with hormone receptor-positive invasive early breast cancer were included in these studies, of whom 1285 had a pregnancy after breast cancer diagnosis. Median follow-up time ranged from 3.8 to 15.8 years and was similar in the pregnancy and non-pregnancy cohorts. In three studies (n = 987 patients) reporting on DFS, no difference was observed between patients with and those without a subsequent pregnancy (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.75-1.24, P = 0.781). In the six studies (n = 3504 patients) reporting on OS, patients with a pregnancy after breast cancer had a statistically significant better OS than those without a pregnancy (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27-0.77, P < 0.05).

conclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective cohort studies provides updated evidence that having a pregnancy in patients with prior history of hormone receptor-positive invasive early breast cancer appears safe without detrimental effect on prognosis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansPregnancyPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective Studiesbreast cancerhormone receptor-positive diseaseoncofertilitypregnancypremenopausal patients

Identifiers

PMID37879234
PMCPMC10774870
OpenAlexW4387889741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.