Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37878880›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2023

In the Cardiac Rehabilitation Era, is There a "No-Option" Refractory Angina Patient?: A Case Report.

Luciana Oliveira Cascaes Dourado, Camila Paixão Jordão, Camila Regina Alves Assumpção, Luciana Diniz Nagem Janot de Matos

Abstract readCase ReportsLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luciana Oliveira Cascaes DouradoInstituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo , SP - Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-3546-4166
Camila Paixão JordãoInstituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo , SP - Brasil.
Camila Regina Alves AssumpçãoInstituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo , SP - Brasil.
Luciana Diniz Nagem Janot de MatosHospital Israelita Albert Einstein , São Paulo , SP - Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation, an effective and safe adjuvant treatment recommended to patients with coronary artery disease, is scarcely applied to patients with refractory angina (RA) due to difficulties related to safety, trainning prescription and their clinical management. This case report presents an instance of a "no-option" patient with RA, who was included in a 12-week exercise program, in sessions consisted of 40 minutes of treadmill aerobic exercise, three times a week, and intensity prescribed between ischemic/angina threshold and ventilatory threshold 1, obtained in the cardiopulmonary exercise test; mild to moderate angina was allowed during training. Furthermore, 15 minutes of moderate-intensity resistance training (large group muscle exercises, two sets of 8 to 12 repetitions) was performed. At the end of the protocol, the patient presented an important improvement in functional performance (VO 2 peak 17.0 ml/kg/min to 27.3 ml/kg/min), angina threshold (HR 68 bpm to 95 bpm), and intensity chest pain (levels 7 to 5) with no clinical adverse events during the period. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation was safe, even in the occurrence of angina/ischemia during training, according to tolerability to symptoms and other warning clinical signs.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationCoronary Artery DiseaseAngina PectorisExerciseExercise TestExercise TherapyHumans

Identifiers

PMID37878880
PMCPMC10567080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.