ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2023
Accurate Quantum Chemical Reaction Energies for Lithium-Mediated Electrolyte Decomposition and Evaluation of Density Functional Approximations.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence for multi-LiNature · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An important concern related to the performance of Li-ion batteries is the formation of a solid electrolyte interphase on the surface of the anode. This film is formed from the decomposition of electrolytes and can have important effects on the stability and performance. Here, we evaluate the decomposition pathway of ethylene carbonate and related organic electrolyte molecules using a series of density functional approximations and correlated wave function (WF) methods, including the coupled-cluster theory with single, double, and perturbative triple excitations [CCSD(T)] and auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC). We find that the transition state barrier associated with ring opening varies widely across different functionals, ranging from 3.01 to 17.15 kcal/mol, which can be compared to the value of 12.84 kcal/mol predicted by CCSD(T). This large variation underscores the importance of benchmarking against accurate WF methods. A performance comparison of all of the density functionals used in this study reveals that the M06-2X-D3 (a meta-hybrid GGA), CAM-B3LYP-D3 (a range-separated hybrid), and B2GP-PLYP-D3 (a double hybrid) perform the best, with average errors of about 1.50-1.60 kcal/mol compared to CCSD(T). We also compared the performance of the WF methods that are more scalable than CCSD(T), finding that DLPNO-CCSD(T) and phaseless AFQMC with a DFT trial wave function exhibit average errors of 1.38 and 1.74 kcal/mol, respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.