Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37878701›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Innovation and elaboration on the avian tree of life.

Thomas Guillerme, Jen A Bright, Christopher R Cooney, Emma C Hughes, Zoë K Varley, Natalie Cooper, Andrew P Beckerman, Gavin H Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas GuillermeSchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4325-1275
Jen A BrightSchool of Natural Science, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9284-9591
Christopher R CooneySchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4872-9146
Emma C HughesSchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4682-6257
Zoë K VarleyNatural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Natalie CooperNatural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4919-8655
Andrew P BeckermanSchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-9143
Gavin H ThomasSchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1982-6051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widely documented, megaevolutionary jumps in phenotypic diversity continue to perplex researchers because it remains unclear whether these marked changes can emerge from microevolutionary processes. Here, we tackle this question using new approaches for modeling multivariate traits to evaluate the magnitude and distribution of elaboration and innovation in the evolution of bird beaks. We find that elaboration, evolution along the major axis of phenotypic change, is common at both macro- and megaevolutionary scales, whereas innovation, evolution away from the major axis of phenotypic change, is more prominent at megaevolutionary scales. The major axis of phenotypic change among species beak shapes at megaevolutionary scales is an emergent property of innovation across clades. Our analyses suggest that the reorientation of phenotypes via innovation is a ubiquitous route for divergence that can arise through gradual change alone, opening up further avenues for evolution to explore.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBirdsAnimalsBeakPhenotypePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID37878701
PMCPMC10599619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.