Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37878634›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Hospital-based violence prevention programmes in South Wales Emergency Departments: A process evaluation protocol.

Jordan Van Godwin, Graham Moore, David O'Reilly, Megan Hamilton, Niamh Clift, Simon C Moore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan Van GodwinDECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, SPARK, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5288-6614
Graham MooreDECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, SPARK, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
David O'ReillySouth Wales Trauma Network, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Port Talbot, Wales, United Kingdom.
Megan HamiltonDECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, SPARK, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Niamh CliftDECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, SPARK, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Simon C MooreViolence Research Group, School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5495-4705
Cardiff University · GBSwansea Bay University Health Board · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddressing violence related harm is a global public health priority. While violence is primarily managed in the criminal justice system, healthcare supports and manages those injured by violence. Emergency Departments (EDs), the primary destination for those seriously injured, have emerged as a candidate location for violence prevention initiatives. There is limited evaluation of ED-based violence prevention, and a lack of guidance for the implementation and delivery of them. Nurse-led Violence Prevention Teams (VPTs) have been developed and implemented in two EDs in Wales, UK. This protocol describes methods used in the process evaluation of these VPTs.

aimTo understand how VPTs function, how they were implemented, and mechanisms of impact, as well as the exploration of wider contextual factors influencing their function.

methodsAdopting a critical realist approach and informed by the Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance for process evaluations, the process evaluation will employ qualitative methods to collect and analyse data: a scoping review of evidence of effectiveness that considers the causal mechanisms underpinning violence; a documentary analysis to determine operational considerations concerning the development, implementation and delivery of the VPTs; a descriptive analysis of routine ED data to characterise the prevalence of violence-related attendances in each ED; interviews with professional stakeholders (N = 60) from the violence prevention ecologies in which the VPTs are embedded. DISCUSSION: This protocol outlines a process evaluation of a novel, nurse led violence prevention intervention. Findings will be used to inform policy makers' decision making on whether and how VPTs should be used in practice in other EDs across the UK, and the extent that a single operational model should be adjusted to address the local characteristic of violence. To the authors knowledge, this is the first process evaluation of a UK-based, nurse led Emergency Department Violence Prevention Team.

trial registrationProtocol registration ISRCTN: 15286575. Registered 13th March, 2023.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalViolenceData CollectionHospitalsRecordsReview Literature as Topic

Identifiers

PMID37878634
PMCPMC10599583
OpenAlexW4387935154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.