Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37878619›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Evaluation of the efficacy of using indocyanine green associated with fluorescence in sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Rafael da Silva Sá, Raquel Fujinohara Von Ah Rodrigues, Luiz Antônio Bugalho, Suelen Umbelino da Silva, Afonso Celso Pinto Nazário

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rafael da Silva SáDiscipline of Mastology, Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-4201
Raquel Fujinohara Von Ah RodriguesDepartment of Gynecology and Mastology, Hospital de Esperança, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Antônio BugalhoDepartment of Gynecology and Mastology, Hospital de Esperança, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Suelen Umbelino da SilvaUniversidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Afonso Celso Pinto NazárioDiscipline of Mastology, Department of Gynecology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSentinel lymph node biopsy is the technique recommended for the axillary staging of patients with breast cancer in the initial stages without clinical axillary involvement. Three techniques are widely used globally to detect sentinel lymph nodes: patent blue, the radiopharmaceutical technetium 99 with gamma probe, and the combination of these two.

objectivesTo evaluate the sentinel lymph node detection rate with an innovative technique: indocyanine green (ICG) associated with fluorescence in breast cancer patients, and compare it with patent blue and a combination of patent blue and indocyanine green.

methods99 patients were sequentially (not randomly) allocated into 3 arms with 33 patients submitted to sentinel lymph node techniques. One arm underwent patent blue dying, the other indocyanine green, and the third received a combination of both. The detection rates between arms were compared.

resultsThe detection rate in identifying the sentinel lymph node was 78.8% with patent blue, 93.9% with indocyanine green, and 100% with the combination. Indocyanine green identified two sentinel nodes in 48.5% of patients; the other groups more commonly had only one node identified. The mean time to sentinel lymph node identification was 20.6 ± 10.7 SD (standard deviation) minutes among patients submitted to the patent blue dye, 8.6 ± 6.6 minutes in the indocyanine green arm, and 10 ± 8.9 minutes in the combined group (P<0.001; Student's test). The mean surgery time was 69.4 ± 16.9; 55.1 ± 13.9; and 69.4 ± 19.3 minutes respectively (P<0.001; Student's test).

conclusionsThe sentinel lymph node detection rate by fluorescence using indocyanine green was 93.9%, considered adequate. The rates using patent blue, indocyanine green, and patent blue plus indocyanine green (combined) were significantly different, and the indocyanine green alone is also acceptable, since it has a good performance in sentinel lymph node identification and it can avoid tattooing, with a 100% sentinel lymph node detection rate when combined with patent blue.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphadenopathySentinel Lymph NodeColoring AgentsFemaleHumansIndocyanine GreenLymph NodesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyColoring AgentsIndocyanine Green

Identifiers

PMID37878619
PMCPMC10599532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.