Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37878362›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

A Web-Based Total Worker Health Intervention for Those Fighting Wildland Fires: Mixed Methods Development and Effectiveness Trial.

Kerry Kuehl, Diane Elliot, Carol DeFrancesco, Wendy McGinnis, Susanna Ek, Bharti Garg

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05753358 (Total Worker Health for Wildland Firefighters), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05753358 nacompletednot on this map

Total Worker Health for Wildland Firefighters

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled150ConditionsHealth Behavior, Total Worker Health, Occupational HealthArmsTotal Worker Health for Wildland Firefighters
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kerry Kuehl *Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6587-5057
Diane Elliot *Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6883-1092
Carol DeFrancesco *Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8664-2490
Wendy McGinnis *Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2164-9610
Susanna Ek *Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2653-6092
Bharti Garg *Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6731-0623

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFire seasons are longer, with more and larger wildfires, placing increased demands and risks on those fighting wildland fires. There are multiple agencies involved with fighting wildland fires and unique worksite conditions make meeting these workers' needs a challenge.

objectiveThe aim of the study is to develop and establish the effectiveness of a web-based safety and health program for those fighting wildland fires.

methodsThis mixed methods project had 3 phases. The initial qualitative phase assessed the needs of 150 diverse firefighters through interviews and focus groups across 11 US sites to establish and prioritize program content. Interview transcripts were read for thematic content with iterative readings used to identify, code, and rank health and safety issues. The second phase used that information to build a comprehensive Total Worker Health program for those fighting wildfires. The program content was based on the qualitative interview data and consisted of 6 core and 8 elective 30-minute, web-based modules primarily done individually on a smartphone or computer. The final, third phase evaluated the program with a quantitative prospective proof-of-concept, usability, and effectiveness trial among wildland firefighter participants. Effectiveness was assessed with paired 2-tailed t tests for pre- and post-Likert agreement scale survey items, adjusted for multiple comparisons. In addition to assessing mean and SD at baseline and postsurvey, observed effect sizes were calculated (Cohen d). Usability and reaction to the program among firefighters who responded to postsurvey were also assessed.

resultsThe qualitative themes and subthemes were used to inform the program's content. For the effectiveness trial, 131 firefighters completed the presurvey, and 50 (38.2%) completed the postsurvey. The majority of the participants were White (n=123, 93.9%), male (n=117, 89.3%), with an average age of 41 (SD 12.9) years. Significant increases in knowledge and desired health and safety behaviors were found for both cancer (P<.001) and cardiovascular risk (P=.01), nutrition behaviors (P=.01), hydration or overheating (P=.001), binge drinking (P=.002), and getting medical checkups (P=.001). More than 80% (n=40) of postsurvey respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the program was easy to use and would recommend it to others.

conclusionsAn innovative web-based safety and health promotion program for those fighting wildland fires was feasible, scalable, and usable. It improved the health and safety of those fighting wildland fires.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05753358; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05753358.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionWildfiresAdultData AccuracyFocus GroupsHumansMaleProspective Studiesfirefighterhealth and safetyhealth care workerhealth promotionmixed methodsmobile phoneoccupational healthoccupational safetyTotal Worker Healthweb-basedweb-based safetywildlandwildland firefighter

Identifiers

PMID37878362
PMCPMC10632911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.