Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37878272›Full record

SynthesisJAMA dermatology2023

Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Nutraceuticals for Treating Acne: A Systematic Review.

Ali Shields, Sophia Ly, Bruna Wafae, Yu-Feng Chang, Priya Manjaly, Marjorie Archila, Christina Heinrich, Lara Drake, Arash Mostaghimi, John S Barbieri

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The research progress and potential applications ofThe British journal of nutrition · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ali ShieldsDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sophia LyDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bruna WafaeDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Yu-Feng ChangDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Priya ManjalyDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marjorie ArchilaDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christina HeinrichTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lara DrakeDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Arash MostaghimiDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
John S BarbieriDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USTufts University · US

Funding

Applying Item Response Theory to Improve Patient Reported Outcome Use in Dermatology Clinical PracticeK23AR078930 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI John Barbieri · 2022 to 2026
$867k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR078930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with acne are interested in nutraceuticals as a potential treatment option. However, there is uncertainty regarding the efficacy and safety of these products. Objective: To evaluate the evidence for oral nutraceuticals in the treatment of acne. Evidence Review: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through January 30, 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials evaluating oral nutraceutical interventions (ie, vitamins and minerals, botanical extracts, prebiotics, and probiotics) in individuals with acne. Clinician-reported outcomes (eg, investigator global assessment, lesion counts), patient-reported outcomes (eg, quality of life), and adverse events were extracted from the included studies. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias checklist tool for randomized clinical trials. Based on the Risk of Bias tool, articles were converted to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standards of good, fair, or poor quality. Findings: A total of 2582 abstracts were identified in the database search, 42 of which met inclusion criteria (a total of 3346 participants). Studies of fair or good quality showed the potential benefit of vitamins B5 and D, botanical extracts (green tea), probiotics, and ω-3 fatty acids in the treatment of acne. These interventions were most frequently associated with decreased lesion counts or improved investigator global assessment scores. Adverse effects were rare for most of the therapies evaluated, but gastrointestinal tract adverse effects were reported for zinc therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review suggests a possible role for nutraceutical supplements in the treatment of acne. Physicians should be prepared to discuss the evidence regarding the potential role of nutraceuticals with patients. Many studies were of small size, and future research should focus on larger randomized clinical trials to assess the utility of nutraceuticals in the treatment of acne.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisProbioticsDietary SupplementsHumansQuality of LifeVitaminsVitamins

Identifiers

PMID37878272
PMCPMC11015159
OpenAlexW4387931562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.