SynthesisJAMA dermatology2023
Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Nutraceuticals for Treating Acne: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in JAMA dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic Benefits of Topical Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Skin Diseases and Cosmetics: An Updated Systematic Review.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics as Oral Supplements for Skin Health, Function, and Disease Throughout the Life Course: A Scoping Review.Nutrition reviews · 2026Article
- Oral Zinc Supplementation in Acne Vulgaris and Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Updated Comprehensive Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Potential Supportive Effects of AP Collagen Peptides on Skin Hydration in a Mouse Model of Oxazolone-Induced Atopic Dermatitis.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Ultra-Processed Diets and Pediatric Acne: Insulin-mTOR Activation and Its Potential Role in Cutaneous Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Impact of Probiotics on Acne Vulgaris: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Cureus · 2025Review
- Epigallocatechin-Gallate (EGCG): An Essential Molecule for Human Health and Well-Being.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The research progress and potential applications ofThe British journal of nutrition · 2025Review
- Review
- High interest in dietary modifications for acne management: insights from a United States-based patient survey.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Article
- Use and cost of dietary changes, supplements, over-the-counter topicals, and prescriptions for acne: a cross-sectional survey among United States adults.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Deficit of Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Acne Patients-A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study in a German Cohort.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Causal roles of skin and gut microbiota in skin appendage disorders suggested by genetic study.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Patients with acne are interested in nutraceuticals as a potential treatment option. However, there is uncertainty regarding the efficacy and safety of these products. Objective: To evaluate the evidence for oral nutraceuticals in the treatment of acne. Evidence Review: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through January 30, 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials evaluating oral nutraceutical interventions (ie, vitamins and minerals, botanical extracts, prebiotics, and probiotics) in individuals with acne. Clinician-reported outcomes (eg, investigator global assessment, lesion counts), patient-reported outcomes (eg, quality of life), and adverse events were extracted from the included studies. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias checklist tool for randomized clinical trials. Based on the Risk of Bias tool, articles were converted to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standards of good, fair, or poor quality. Findings: A total of 2582 abstracts were identified in the database search, 42 of which met inclusion criteria (a total of 3346 participants). Studies of fair or good quality showed the potential benefit of vitamins B5 and D, botanical extracts (green tea), probiotics, and ω-3 fatty acids in the treatment of acne. These interventions were most frequently associated with decreased lesion counts or improved investigator global assessment scores. Adverse effects were rare for most of the therapies evaluated, but gastrointestinal tract adverse effects were reported for zinc therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review suggests a possible role for nutraceutical supplements in the treatment of acne. Physicians should be prepared to discuss the evidence regarding the potential role of nutraceuticals with patients. Many studies were of small size, and future research should focus on larger randomized clinical trials to assess the utility of nutraceuticals in the treatment of acne.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.