ArticleJournal of nephrology2023
Differences in the purpose of exercise between hemodialysis patients who continued or dropped out of exercise programs: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelecting suitable exercise goals is crucial for fostering adherence to, and maintenance of, exercise therapy. We aimed to evaluate the variance in exercise objectives between individuals who continued and those who dropped out of a 6-month intradialytic exercise program by analyzing an open-ended questionnaire administered to patients undergoing hemodialysis.
methodsThe study consisted of outpatients (n = 541; mean age, 70 years) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, who had been informed of an intradialytic exercise program and voluntarily agreed to participate. The primary outcome was the exercise purpose. The difference in exercise purpose was quantitatively analyzed between the exercise continuation and dropout groups. A co-occurrence network was created and concepts were constructed. The basic attributes were compared using chi-squared and independent t-tests.
resultsOver 6 months, 154 patients (28.5%) dropped out of the intradialytic exercise program. Concepts related to the goals of the program were: (1) physical function and condition, (2) addressing limitations, (3) maintaining daily life activities, and (4) physical condition recognition. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that the exercise continuation group established their objectives based on the health benefits of exercise, and proactively set goals rooted in comprehending their current issues and problems. The dropout group tended to perceive treatment passively as an extension of daily clinical practice, rather than actively formulating exercise objectives.
conclusionThe exercise objectives of those who continued the exercise program differed from those who dropped out. Patients in the exercise continuation group set more affirmative and specific exercise objectives, whereas those in the dropout group set more passive and abstract exercise objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.