Trial reportEating and weight disorders : EWD2023
Development and initial validation of the trait and state Mindful Eating Behaviour Scales.
Trial report in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and initial validation of the Mindful Eating Behaviour Scale for children and parents.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2026Article
- Exploring differences in mindfulness and mindful eating between adults with varying weight status.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2026Article
- "Eating isn't just about paying attention-It's about the self-regulation of sensory attention while eating!": Exploring mindful eating by examining sensory attention and non-judgmental awareness in the context of eating cessation.Nutrition and health · 2025Article
- Exploring the experiences of people with obesity and post-bariatric surgery patients after three months using the mindful eating reflective practice: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.Nutrition and health · 2025Article
- Addressing individual needs in mindful eating: a latent profile analysis and exploration of demographics and social-cognitive beliefs.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring the interplay between mindful eating and self-compassion: insights from three empirical studies and future directions for research.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Mindful paths to food waste reduction: exploring the associations between gratitude, mindful eating behavior, and motivations for food waste avoidance.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Article
- Mindful eating and eating behaviours in Greece: exploring the validity and reliability of two mindful eating scales and other eating behaviours for Greek-speaking populations.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe quantitative assessment of mindful eating has been challenging, even with the latest additions to the field of multifactorial mindful eating psychometric tools. This manuscript presents the development, validity and reliability assessment of a trait and state Mindful Eating Behaviour Scale across four studies driven by recent theory (Mantzios in Nutr Health 27: 1-5, 2021).
methodsStudy 1 assessed the content validity of the scale through ratings of clinical and research experts in the field. Study 2 inspected the scale through exploratory and confirmatory factor, parallel, correlation, and reliability analyses. Study 3 assessed the temporal stability through a test-retest in a 2-week interval. Study 4 assessed the scale in a randomized control experimental design, where a mindful eating (vs. control group) received the trait scale before consuming chocolate, and an equivalent state scale was modified to assess state changes during the 10-min eating session.
resultsStudy 1 yielded items to be reflective and concise of the definition of mindful eating behaviour. Study 2 indicated 2 potential factors through exploratory factor analyses, which were further verified through a parallel analysis, while subscales correlation indicated one-dimensionality, which was further verified through confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, the internal consistency of the scale and subscales was good. Study 3 certified the reliability of the scale over time, while Study 4 indicated that both the trait and state scales were significant indicators of eating mindfully.
conclusionsTogether, all studies signal the utility of theoretically sound and empirically validated measurements for the replicable assessment of mindful eating behaviour. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: No level of evidence: basic science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.