Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37878161›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2025

Combined subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemaker devices in complex congenital heart disease: a single-center experienced based study.

Berardo Sarubbi, Giovanni Domenico Ciriello, Giovanni Papaccioli, Anna Correra, Emanuele Romeo, Nicola Grimaldi, Diego Colonna, Michela Palma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strategies for preventing arrhythmic sudden death in adult congenital heart disease.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  2. End-of-the-year Review: Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease in 2025.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Berardo SarubbiMonaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy. berardo.sarubbi@ospedalideicolli.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-8500
Giovanni Domenico CirielloMonaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Giovanni PapaccioliMonaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Anna CorreraMonaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Emanuele RomeoMonaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Nicola GrimaldiMonaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Diego ColonnaMonaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Michela PalmaMonaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Ospedale Monaldi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD) are widely accepted therapy in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients at risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death (SCD) when pacing is not required. Occasionally, pacemaker (PM)-dependent CHD patients will subsequently develop an indication for a cardioverter defibrillator. The use of S-ICD in complex CHD patients who have had already PM devices implanted implies some specific considerations, as the safety for these patients in unknown and recommendations among physicians may vary widely.

methodsWe review the data and studied the indications for S-ICD in complex CHD with previous PM and discuss its usefulness in clinical practice.

resultsFrom a large cohort of 345 patients enrolled in the S-ICD Monaldi care registry, which encompass all the patients implanted in the Monaldi Hospital of Naples, we considered 11 consecutive complex CHD patients (10M/1F aged 40.4 ±18.4 years) who underwent S-ICD implant after a previous PM implant, from February 2015 to October 2022. Mean follow-up was 25.5 ± 22 months. All the patients showed a good compliance to the device system with no complications (infections or skin erosions).

conclusionsIn complex CHD with already implanted PM devices, S-ICD implant appears to be a safe alternative to PM upgrading to transvenous ICD system, avoiding abandoned leads or life-threatening lead extraction. However, there are important issues with regard to testing and programming that need to be addressed at the time of implantation.

Indexed as

Death, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableHeart Defects, CongenitalPacemaker, ArtificialAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCongenital heart diseasePacemakerSubcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillatorSudden deathTransvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillatorVentricular arrhythmias

Identifiers

PMID37878161
OpenAlexW4387930645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.