Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37878160›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2023

Quantitative and clinical implications of the EARL2 versus EARL1 [

Maurice C Cox, Tijn Jurcka, Anne I J Arens, Maartje C van Rijk, Johannes H A M Kaanders, Sven van den Bosch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 67% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dual-time-point [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  3. Sex- and Age-Related Differences in Physiological [Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Maurice C CoxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. maurice.cc.cox@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6428-4941
Tijn JurckaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anne I J ArensDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maartje C van RijkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Johannes H A M KaandersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sven van den BoschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EANM Research Ltd. (EARL) guidelines give recommendations for harmonization of [

methodsForty-nine consecutive patients with HNSCC were included. For all, both EARL1 and EARL2 images were reconstructed from a singular [

resultsThere was a significant increase in SUV

conclusionsUsing the EARL2 method for PET image reconstruction resulted in higher SUV

Indexed as

EARLHead and neck cancerPET-CTSUV

Identifiers

PMID37878160
PMCPMC10600079
OpenAlexW4387931552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.