Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37878135›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2024

Prostate-specific antigen testing rates in high-risk populations: results from the All of Us Research Program.

Faith Morley, Hari S Iyer, Rulla M Tamimi, David M Nanus, Timothy R Rebbeck, Kevin H Kensler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Faith MorleyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 402 E 67th Street LA-265, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Hari S IyerSection of Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Rulla M TamimiDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 402 E 67th Street LA-265, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
David M NanusSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Timothy R RebbeckDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Kevin H KenslerDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 402 E 67th Street LA-265, New York, NY, 10065, USA. kek4007@med.cornell.edu.
Weill Cornell Medicine · USCornell University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USPresbyterian Hospital · USRutgers Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Precision Interception of Aggressive Prostate Cancer in African American MenP20CA233255 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI REBBECK, TIMOTHY R · 2018 to 2020
$3.2M
Contributions of tumor molecular subtypes to prostate cancer racial disparitiesR00CA245900 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI KENSLER, KEVIN HUGHES · 2021 to 2023
$689k
NCI NIH HHS P20 CA233255NCI NIH HHS P20CA233255NCI NIH HHS R00 CA245900NCI NIH HHS R00CA245900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection of prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remains controversial and disparities in the receipt of prostate cancer screening persist in the US. We sought to examine disparities in PSA testing rates among groups with higher prostate cancer risk and differential access to healthcare.

methodsWe identified a cohort of 37,706 males within the All of Us Research Program without a history of prostate cancer between the ages of 40 and 85 at time of enrollment (2017-2021). Incidence rate ratios (IRR) for the number of PSA tests received during follow-up through December 2021 were estimated using age- and multivariable-adjusted negative binomial regression models. PSA testing frequencies in the cohort were compared with population-based estimates from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

resultsA total of 6,486 males (17.2%) received at least one PSA test over the course of follow-up. In multivariable-adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black males received PSA tests at a 17% lower rate (IRR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76, 0.90) than non-Hispanic White males. Higher educational attainment, higher annual income, having self-/employer-purchased insurance, having a spouse or domestic partner, and having a family history of prostate cancer were all associated with higher rates of PSA testing. The proportion of males ages 55 to 69 who received a PSA test within two years was lower in All of Us (12.4%, 95% CI 11.8-13.0%) relative to population-based estimates from the BRFSS (35.2%, 95% CI 34.2-36.3%).

conclusionAbsolute PSA testing rates in All of Us were lower than population-based estimates, but associations with PSA testing in the cohort mirrored previously reported disparities in prostate cancer screening. These findings highlight the importance of addressing barriers to care in order to reduce disparities in cancer screening.

Indexed as

Population HealthProstatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEarly Detection of CancerEthnicityHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenCancer screeningEarly detection of cancerHealth disparitiesProstate cancerProstate-specific antigen

Identifiers

PMID37878135
PMCPMC10838840
OpenAlexW4387930835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.