ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2024
Association between hypertension grades and cancer mortality among Japanese men and women.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer and Hypertension: Shared Mechanisms, Treatment Interactions, and Clinical Management.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Differential Modulation of Markers of Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage in Arterial Hypertension.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to examine the association between hypertension grades and the risk of total and site-specific cancer mortality among Japanese men and women.
methodsIn the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study, 27,332 participants aged 40-79 years were enrolled and followed up with their mortality until 2009. According to the measured blood pressure (BP) at baseline, we classified the participants into four BP categories based on 2018 European guidelines. The Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of total and site-specific cancer mortality according to the hypertension category.
resultsDuring the 18.5 years of median follow-up, 1,927 cancer deaths were documented. Grade 1 (systolic blood pressure [SBP] 140-159 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 90-99 mmHg) and grade 2-3 hypertension (SBP ≥ 160 mmHg or DBP ≥ 100 mmHg) were associated with an increased risk of total cancer mortality; the multivariable HRs were 1.17 (1.04-1.32) for grade 1, and 1.27 (1.09-1.47) for grade 2-3 hypertension compared to optimal and normal BP (SBP < 130 mmHg and DBP < 85 mmHg). Linear and positive associations were observed between SBP and DBP 10 mmHg increment and the risk of total cancer mortality; HRs were 1.06 (1.03-1.08) for SBP and 1.07 (1.02-1.11) for DBP of 10 mmHg increment. The excess risk was primarily found for esophageal, liver, and pancreatic cancer; the respective multivariable HRs of grade 2-3 hypertension vs optimal and normal BP were 2.57 (1.10-6.04) for esophageal, 1.67 (1.01-2.77) for liver, and 1.95 (1.17-3.23) for pancreatic cancer.
conclusionHypertension was associated with the increased risk of total cancer mortality, primarily of esophageal, liver, and pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37878134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.