Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37877864›Full record

ArticleUrology research & practice2023

The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice.

Duygu Enneli, Tolga Baglan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology research & practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Duygu EnneliDepartment of Pathology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Tolga BaglanDepartment of Pathology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma is a heterogeneous disease with histomorphological and genomic variations throughout the same tumor or between tumors from different patients. It has been shown that most of these histologic and genetic differences have prognostic significance and may have a guiding role in determining the appropriate treatment choice for the patient. Therefore, it is crucial for both the pathologist and the clinician to be conscious of these variations and to consider them in patient management. Recently, a consensus molecular classification has been developed and categorized urothelial carcinomas into 6 subclasses. These molecular subclasses seem to be associated with prognosis and/or response to certain therapeutic approaches like chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitory therapy; however, it has not yet been sufficiently validated and has some limitations for routine application. As is well known, there are therapeutic limitations in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinomas, especially those inappropriate for standard therapy with platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. Emerging new therapeutic approaches and testing for appropriate patient selection for those are discussed in this article.

Identifiers

PMID37877864
PMCPMC10346099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.