Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37877779›Full record

ArticleCancer discovery2024

Loss-of-Function but Not Gain-of-Function Properties of Mutant TP53 Are Critical for the Proliferation, Survival, and Metastasis of a Broad Range of Cancer Cells.

Zilu Wang, Matteo Burigotto, Sabrina Ghetti, François Vaillant, Tao Tan, Bianca D Capaldo, Michelle Palmieri, Yumiko Hirokawa, Lin Tai, Daniel S Simpson and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zilu WangThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1040-7990
Matteo BurigottoArmenise-Harvard Laboratory of Cell Division, Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology - CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1891-4057
Sabrina GhettiArmenise-Harvard Laboratory of Cell Division, Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology - CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4981-9012
François VaillantThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3229-3760
Tao TanThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5924-4112
Bianca D CapaldoThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-6920
Michelle PalmieriThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-9974
Yumiko HirokawaThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2173-6634
Lin TaiThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3881-8938
Daniel S SimpsonThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6248-427X
Catherine ChangThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-9679-6615
Allan Shuai HuangThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2542-1616
Elizabeth LieschkeThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3320-1565
Sarah T DiepstratenThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1946-5161
Deeksha KaloniThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6193-5120
Chris RiffkinThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-0244-7992
David C S HuangThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3101-4873
Connie S N Li Wai SuenThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0529-0804
Alexandra L GarnhamThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8312-8450
Peter GibbsThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1423-4484
Jane E VisvaderThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9173-6977
Oliver M SieberThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9480-0786
Marco J HeroldThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7539-7581
Luca L FavaArmenise-Harvard Laboratory of Cell Division, Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology - CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6741-1723
Gemma L Kelly *The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6533-1201
Andreas Strasser *The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5020-4891
The University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Trento · ITWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust 101671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in the tumor suppressor TP53 cause cancer and impart poor chemotherapeutic responses, reportedly through loss-of-function, dominant-negative effects and gain-of-function (GOF) activities. The relative contributions of these attributes is unknown. We found that removal of 12 different TP53 mutants with reported GOFs by CRISPR/Cas9 did not impact proliferation and response to chemotherapeutics of 15 human cancer cell lines and colon cancer-derived organoids in culture. Moreover, removal of mutant TP53/TRP53 did not impair growth or metastasis of human cancers in immune-deficient mice or growth of murine cancers in immune-competent mice. DepMap mining revealed that removal of 158 different TP53 mutants had no impact on the growth of 391 human cancer cell lines. In contrast, CRISPR-mediated restoration of wild-type TP53 extinguished the growth of human cancer cells in vitro. These findings demonstrate that LOF but not GOF effects of mutant TP53/TRP53 are critical to sustain expansion of many tumor types. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides evidence that removal of mutant TP53, thereby deleting its reported GOF activities, does not impact the survival, proliferation, metastasis, or chemotherapy responses of cancer cells. Thus, approaches that abrogate expression of mutant TP53 or target its reported GOF activities are unlikely to exert therapeutic impact in cancer. See related commentary by Lane, p. 211 . This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 201.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53AnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationHumansMiceMutationTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID37877779
PMCPMC10850947
OpenAlexW4387930812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.