Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37877594›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2023

Patient and healthcare professional acceptability of pharmacogenetic screening for DPYD and UGT1A1: A cross sectional survey.

Sarah Glewis, Mei Krishnasamy, Senthil Lingaratnam, Sam Harris, Craig Underhill, Chloe Georgiou, Mark Warren, Robert Campbell, Maarten IJzerman, Mussab Fagery and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah GlewisDepartment of Pharmacy, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7764-5427
Mei KrishnasamySir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Senthil LingaratnamDepartment of Pharmacy, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sam HarrisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Craig UnderhillVCCC Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chloe GeorgiouDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Mark WarrenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Robert CampbellDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Maarten IJzermanSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Mussab FageryCancer Research, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ian CampbellSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jennifer H MartinSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8614-0199
Jeanne TieSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Marliese AlexanderDepartment of Pharmacy, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5782-7912
Michael MichaelSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUBendigo Health · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUVictorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored the acceptability of a novel pharmacist-led pharmacogenetics (PGx) screening program among patients with cancer and healthcare professionals (HCPs) taking part in a multicenter clinical trial of PGx testing (PACIFIC-PGx ANZCTR:12621000251820). Medical oncologists, oncology pharmacists, and patients with cancer from across four sites (metropolitan/regional), took part in an observational, cross-sectional survey. Participants were recruited from the multicenter trial. Two study-specific surveys were developed to inform implementation strategies for scaled and sustainable translation into routine clinical care: one consisting of 21 questions targeting HCPs and one consisting of 17 questions targeting patients. Responses were collected from 24 HCPs and 288 patients. The 5-to-7-day PGx results turnaround time was acceptable to HCP (100%) and patients (69%). Most HCPs (92%) indicated that it was appropriate for the PGx clinical pharmacist to provide results to patients. Patients reported equal preference for receiving PGx results from a doctor/pharmacist. Patients and HCPs highly rated the pharmacist-led PGx service. HCPs were overall accepting of the program, with the majority (96%) willing to offer PGx testing to their patients beyond the trial. HCPs identified that lack of financial reimbursements (62%) and lack of infrastructure (38%) were the main reasons likely to prevent/slow the implementation of PGx screening program into routine clinical care. Survey data have shown overall acceptability from patients and HCPs participating in the PGx Program. Barriers to implementation of PGx testing in routine care have been identified, providing opportunity to develop targeted implementation strategies for scaled translation into routine practice.

Indexed as

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase DeficiencyNeoplasmsPharmacogenomic TestingCross-Sectional StudiesDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)Health PersonnelHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePharmacogeneticsUGT1A1 EnzymeDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)DPYD protein, humanUGT1A1 Enzyme

Identifiers

PMID37877594
PMCPMC10719470
OpenAlexW4387931440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.