ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2023
A unified DNA- and RNA-based NGS strategy for the analysis of multiple types of variants at the dual nucleic acid level in solid tumors.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neoadjuvant pamiparib plus abiraterone and androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk/very high-risk localized prostate cancer: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Trial
- Neoadjuvant darolutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer: a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial.World journal of urology · 2025Trial
- Transforming routine solid tumor profiling with automated next-generation sequencing: experience from a reference general hospital.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Cell-Free DNA-Based Theranostics for Inflammatory Disorders.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Article
- Distinctive circulating microbial metagenomic signatures in the plasma of patients with lung cancer and their potential value as molecular biomarkers.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Molecular and Clinical Features of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Institution Case Series.Cancers · 2024Article
- Characterization and mitigation of artifacts derived from NGS library preparation due to structure-specific sequences in the human genome.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- A unified DNA- and RNA-based NGS strategy for the analysis of multiple types of variants at the dual nucleic acid level in solid tumors.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTargeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a powerful and suitable approach to comprehensively identify multiple types of variants in tumors. RNA-based NGS is increasingly playing an important role in precision oncology. Both parallel and sequential DNA- and RNA-based approaches are expensive, burdensome, and have long turnaround times, which can be impractical in clinical practice. A streamlined, unified DNA- and RNA-based NGS approach is urgently needed in clinical practice.
methodsA DNA/RNA co-hybrid capture sequencing (DRCC-Seq) approach was designed to capture pre-capture DNA and RNA libraries in a single tube and convert them into one NGS library. The performance of the DRCC-Seq approach was evaluated by a panel of reference standards and clinical samples.
resultsThe average depth, DNA data ratio, capture ratio, and target coverage 250 (×) of the DNA panel data had a negative correlation with an increase in the proportion of RNA probes. The SNVs, indels, fusions, and MSI status were not affected by the proportion of RNA probes, but the copy numbers of the target genes were higher than expected in the standard materials, and many unexpected gene amplifications were found using D:R (1:2) and D:R (1:4) probe panels. The optimal ratio of DNA and RNA probes in the combined probe panel was 1:1 using the DRCC-Seq approach. The DRCC-Seq approach was feasible and reliable for detecting multiple types of variants in reference standards and real-world clinical samples.
conclusionsThe DRCC-Seq approach is more cost-effective, with a shorter turnaround time and lower labor requirements than either parallel or sequential targeted DNA NGS and RNA NGS. It is feasible to identify multiple genetic variations at the DNA and RNA levels simultaneously in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.