Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37877423›Full record

Observational studyHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2023

Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study.

Haowen Zou, James M Kemper, Elizabeth R Hammond, Fengqin Xu, Gensheng Liu, Lintao Xue, Xiaohong Bai, Hongqing Liao, Songguo Xue, Shuqin Zhao and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Decision-making criteria in polygenic embryo screening: A survey of reproductive medicine physicians.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Day 3 embryo quality predicts clinical pregnancy and live birth rates following single frozen-thawed poor-quality blastocyst transfer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Haowen ZouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7666-3914
James M KemperDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9483-6639
Elizabeth R HammondFertility Associates, Auckland, New Zealand.
Fengqin XuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Gensheng LiuCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Aiwei Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Lintao XueReproductive Medical and Genetic Center, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Xiaohong BaiDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Hongqing LiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical School, South China University, Hengyang, China.
Songguo XueCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Shuqin ZhaoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Zaozhuang Marternal and Child Health Center, Zaozhuang, China.
Lan XiaReproductive Medical Center of Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jean ScottFertility Solutions, Sunshine Coast, Australia.
Vincent ChappleFertility North, Joondalup, Australia.
Masoud AfnanQingdao United Family Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Dean E MorbeckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8787-9331
Ben W J MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Yanhe LiuFertility North, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6276-7010
Rui WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6622-8134
Monash University · AUBond University · AUMonash Health · AUShanghai East Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNThe People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region · CNTianjin First Center Hospital · CNTianjin Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University General Hospital · CNUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of South China · CN

Funding

Monash Research ScholarshipNHMRC GNT1176437NHMRC Emerging Leadership Investigator 2009767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes the transfer of single low-grade blastocysts result in acceptable reproductive and perinatal outcomes compared to the transfer of single good-grade blastocysts? SUMMARY ANSWER: The transfer of single low-grade blastocysts resulted in a reduced live birth rate of around 30% (14% for very low-grade blastocysts) compared to 44% for single good-grade blastocysts, but does not lead to more adverse perinatal outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It is known that low-grade blastocysts can result in live births. However, the current studies are limited by relatively small sample sizes and single-centre designs. Furthermore, evidence on perinatal outcomes after transferring low-grade blastocysts is limited. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We conducted a multi-centre, multi-national retrospective cohort study of 10 018 women undergoing 10 964 single blastocyst transfer cycles between 2009 and 2020 from 14 clinics across Australia, China, and New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsBlastocysts were graded individually based on assessment of the morphology and development of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE), and were grouped into three quality categories: good- (AB, AB, or BA), moderate- (BB), and low-grade (grade C for ICM or TE) blastocysts. CC blastocysts were individually grouped as very low-grade blastocysts. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equation was used to analyse the association between blastocyst quality and live birth as well as other reproductive outcomes. Binomial, multinomial logistic, or linear regression was used to investigate the association between blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes. Odds ratio (OR), adjusted OR (aOR), adjusted regression coefficient, and their 95% CIs are presented. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were 4386 good-grade blastocysts, 3735 moderate-grade blastocysts, and 2843 low-grade blastocysts were included in the analysis, for which the live birth rates were 44.4%, 38.6%, and 30.2%, respectively. Compared to good-grade blastocysts, the live birth rate of low-grade blastocysts was significantly lower (aOR of 0.48 (0.41-0.55)). Very low-grade blastocysts were associated with an even lower live birth rate (aOR 0.30 (0.18-0.52)) and their absolute live birth rate was 13.7%. There were 4132 singleton live births included in the analysis of perinatal outcomes. Compared with good-grade blastocysts, low-grade blastocysts had comparable preterm birth rates (<37 weeks, aOR 1.00 (0.65-1.54)), birthweight Z-scores (adjusted regression coefficient 0.02 (0.09-0.14)), and rates of very low birth weight (<1500 g, aOR 0.84 (0.22-3.25)), low birth weight (1500-2500 g, aOR 0.96 (0.56-1.65)), high birth weight (>4500 g, aOR 0.93 (0.37-2.32)), small for gestational age (aOR 1.63 (0.91-2.93)), and large for gestational age (aOR 1.28 (0.97-1.70)). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to the nature of the retrospective design, residual confounding could not be excluded. In addition, the number of events for some perinatal outcomes was small. Between-operator and between-laboratory variations in blastocyst assessment were difficult to control. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsPatients undergoing IVF should be informed that low-grade blastocysts result in a lower live birth rate, however they do not increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Further research should focus on the criteria for embryos that should not be transferred and on the follow-up of long-term outcomes of offspring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): H.Z. is supported by a Monash Research Scholarship. B.W.J.M. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437). R.W. is supported by an NHMRC Emerging Leadership Investigator grant (2009767). B.W.J.M. reports consultancy, travel support, and research funding from Merck. The other authors do not have competing interests to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Premature BirthBirth WeightBlastocystEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLive BirthPregnancyRetrospective Studiesblastocyst gradingembryo qualityperinatal outcomereproductive outcomesingle blastocyst transfer

Identifiers

PMID37877423
PMCPMC10694400
OpenAlexW4387931317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.