Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37877175›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

Visual feedback and declines in attention are associated with altered visual strategy during a force-steadiness task in older adults.

Brittany Heintz Walters, Wendy E Huddleston, Kristian O'Connor, Jinsung Wang, Marie Hoeger Bement, Kevin G Keenan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07077460 (Innovative Hand Rehabilitation System With Synchronized Contralateral Haptic Feedback), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07077460 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Hand Rehabilitation System With Synchronized Contralateral Haptic Feedback

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsHealthy ElderlyArmsTIPr, Mirror Visual Feedback Device, Mirror Visual Feedback Device(Blocked mirror), Graded-Pressure Haptic Device (Passive press-feedback cushion)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brittany Heintz WaltersDepartment of Kinesiology, Seattle University, Seattle, Washington, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5418-7072
Wendy E HuddlestonDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences & Technology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Kristian O'ConnorDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8272-4077
Jinsung WangDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Marie Hoeger BementDepartment of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Kevin G KeenanDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USMarquette University · USSeattle University · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UW Milwaukee) Giorgio Sanna Memorial ScholarshipUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UW Milwaukee) Graduate Student Research AwardUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UW Milwaukee) Helen Bader Age & Community Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greater heterogeneity exists in older adults relative to young adults when performing highly skilled manual tasks. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of visual feedback and attentional demand on visual strategy during a submaximal force-steadiness task in young and older adults. Eye movements of 21 young (age 20-38 yr; 11 females, 10 males) and 21 older (age 65-90 yr; 11 females, 10 males) adults were recorded during a pinch force-steadiness task while viewing feedback with higher and lower gain and while performing a visuospatial task. For the visuospatial task, participants imagined a star moving around four boxes and reported the final location after a series of directions. Performance on standardized tests of attention was measured. All participants gazed near the target line and made left-to-right saccadic eye movements during the force-steadiness tasks without the visuospatial task. Older adults made fewer saccades than young adults (21.0 ± 2.9 and 23.6 ± 4.4 saccades, respectively) and with higher versus lower gain (20.9 ± 4.0 and 23.7 ± 3.5 saccades, respectively). Most participants used the same visual strategy when performing the visuospatial task though seven older adults used an altered strategy; gaze did not stay near the target line nor travel exclusively left to right. Performance on standardized measures of attention was impaired in this subset compared with older adults who did not use the altered visual strategy. Results indicate that visual feedback influences visual strategy and reveals unique eye movements in some older adults when allocating attention across tasks.

Indexed as

AttentionFeedback, SensoryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleSaccadesYoung Adultagingattentioneye movementshandolder adults

Identifiers

PMID37877175
PMCPMC10972634
OpenAlexW4387931213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.