ArticleJournal of otology2023
Success rates and predictors of outcomes of type I tympanoplasty performed by residents in a teaching tertiary hospital.
Article in Journal of otology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive factors of successful tympanoplasty and quality of life outcomes in adults with dry perforation: a randomised clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Long-term outcomes of tympanoplasty with persistent air-bone gap in adults with chronic otitis media: hearing, health care utilization and quality of life.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Optimal Grafting Methods in Endoscopic Type 1 Tympanoplasty: A Comprehensive Guide.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several technical variations of tympanoplasty have been reported, usually involving the type of graft and/or instruments used. Few studies have focused on the outcome of type-1 tympanoplasty specifically in teaching scenarios. We aimed to describe the results of type-1 tympanoplasty performed by residents, and to investigate potential predictive factors of surgical success. To do so, we did a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients who underwent type-1 tympanoplasty in a tertiary university hospital. We evaluated the tympanic membrane closure and audiometric outcomes during the first year of follow-up, and compared the results according to some clinical and surgical factors. 130 operated ears were included in the study. The closure rate reached 84.12% after one month and 72.72% after twelve months of surgery. The mean air-bone gap was 22.98 dB preoperatively, and reached 10.55 dB after surgery. Perforation closure rates were 85% and 57.14% for those operated by endoscopic and microscopic-assisted approaches, respectively (p = 0.004). The use of cartilage grafts and time without otorrhea of more than three months prior to surgery were also predictors of surgical success (p = 0.002 and 0.041, respectively). Gender, age, perforation size, contralateral disease, operated side, reoperation, and degree of hearing loss did not significantly interfere with outcomes. Tympanoplasty showed good overall results when performed by residents, although inferior to those reported by experienced surgeons. The use of the endoscope, cartilage grafting, and longer preoperative time without otorrhea were predictors of surgical success in this scenario. Level of evidence: IIB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.