Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37877035›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2023

Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation in Lactating Women Increases Breast Milk and Erythrocyte Membrane Docosahexaenoic Acid Concentrations and Alters Infant n-6:n-3 Fatty Acid Ratio.

Shweta Khandelwal, Dimple Kondal, Ruby Gupta, Monica Chaudhry, Soumam Dutta, Lakshmy Ramakrishnan, Kamal Patil, M K Swamy, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Nikhil Tandon and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Perinatal benefits and recommendations of docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Shweta KhandelwalDepartment of Public Health Nutrition, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India.
Dimple KondalDepartment of Biostatistics, Centre for Chronic Disease Control, Gurugram, India.
Ruby GuptaDepartment of Biostatistics, Centre for Chronic Disease Control, Gurugram, India.
Monica ChaudhryDepartment of Public Health Nutrition, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India.
Soumam DuttaDepartment of Home Science, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India.
Lakshmy RamakrishnanDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Kamal PatilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KLE's J.N. Medical College Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
M K SwamyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KLE's J.N. Medical College Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranDepartment of Public Health Nutrition, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India.
Nikhil TandonDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Usha RamakrishnanHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Aryeh D SteinHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Centre for Chronic Disease Control · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INEmory University · USKLE University · INPublic Health Foundation of India · INUniversity of Calcutta · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low concentrations of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) or high n-6 (ω-6):n-3 ratio in pregnant women is associated with poor fetal growth velocity and suboptimal neurodevelopment. However, there is a lack of data on levels of important n-6 and n-3 fatty acids (FAs) at different time points during pregnancy and lactation from India. Data on how much DHA is transferred during actual supplementation are also scarce. Objectives: We report the concentrations of n-6 and n-3 FAs in maternal and infant blood and in breast milk following maternal supplementation with DHA or placebo. Methods: A total of 957 pregnant women (≤20 wk) from Belagavi, Karnataka, were randomly assigned to receive either 400 mg/d of algal DHA or placebo through 6 mo postpartum. Blood samples were collected from the mother at recruitment/baseline, delivery, and 6 mo postpartum and from the infant at birth (cord) and 12 mo (venous). Breast milk samples were collected from a subsample at delivery, 1 mo and 6 mo postpartum. The FA profile was analyzed using gas chromatography. Results: The concentration of DHA appeared to be higher in erythrocyte and breast milk samples of the DHA-supplemented group at all subsequent time points. The n-6:n-3 ratio was lower among women in the DHA group at delivery [DHA: 4.08 (1.79); placebo: 5.84 (3.57); Conclusions: Maternal DHA supplementation with 400 mg/d from early pregnancy through 6 mo postpartum significantly increased circulating DHA in breast milk and infant erythrocyte, whereas decreased erythrocyte and breast milk n-6:n-3 ratio. However, maternal supplementation did not get the ratio to the recommended levels.

Indexed as

breast milkdocosahexaenoic acidfatty acid transferlinoleic acid (LA)long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (LC-PUFA)n–3 LC-PUFA supplementationplacentapregnancyα linolenic acid (ALA)

Identifiers

PMID37877035
PMCPMC10590723
OpenAlexW4387190586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.