ArticleOphthalmology science
A Convolutional Neural Network Using Multimodal Retinal Imaging for Differentiation of Mild Cognitive Impairment from Normal Cognition.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-driven multimodal retinal imaging for early detection and risk stratification of vascular and neurodegenerative diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Exploring Alzheimer Disease from a Retinal and Ocular Perspective.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- An Ensemble Learning Artificial Intelligence Model for Alzheimer's Disease Detection Using OCT.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Combining OCT and OCT angiography improves differentiation of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Analyzing Retinal Vessel Morphology in MS Using Interpretable AI on Deep Learning-Segmented IR-SLO Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Retinal vessel density and cognitive function in healthy older adults.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- The elusive relationship between retinal anatomy and brain amyloid.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced retinal imaging as a biomarker for systemic diseases.Theranostics · 2025Review
- Early detection of mild cognitive impairment utilizing ocular biomarker-based risk scoring nomogram.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Value proposition of retinal imaging in Alzheimer's disease screening: A review of eight evolving trends.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024Review
- Multimodal Retinal Imaging Classification for Parkinson's Disease Using a Convolutional Neural Network.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- SLO-Net: Enhancing Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis Beyond Optical Coherence Tomography Using Infrared Reflectance Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Images.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology in the Retina.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024Review
- Retinal vasculometry associations with cognition status in UK Biobank.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a machine learning tool capable of differentiating eyes of subjects with normal cognition from those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) using OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA). Design: Evaluation of a diagnostic technology. Participants: Subjects with normal cognition were compared to subjects with MCI. Methods: A multimodal convolutional neural network (CNN) was built to predict likelihood of MCI from ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness maps, OCTA images, and quantitative data including patient characteristics. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and summaries of the confusion matrix (sensitivity and specificity) were used as performance metrics for the prediction outputs of the CNN. Results: Images from 236 eyes of 129 cognitively normal subjects and 154 eyes of 80 MCI subjects were used for training, validating, and testing the CNN. When applied to the independent test set using inputs including GC-IPL thickness maps, OCTA images, and quantitative OCT and OCTA data, the AUC value for the CNN was 0.809 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.681-0.937). This model achieved a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 83%. The AUC value for GC-IPL thickness maps alone was 0.681 (95% CI: 0.529-0.832), for OCTA images alone was 0.625 (95% CI: 0.466-0.784) and for both GC-IPL maps and OCTA images was 0.693 (95% CI: 0.543-0.843). Models using quantitative data alone were also tested, with a model using quantitative data derived from images, 0.960 (95% CI: 0.902-1.00), outperforming a model using demographic data alone, 0.580 (95% CI: 0.417-0.742). Conclusions: This novel CNN was able to identify an MCI diagnosis using an independent test set comprised of OCT and OCTA images and quantitative data. The GC-IPL thickness maps provided more useful decision support than the OCTA images. The addition of quantitative data inputs also provided significant decision support to the CNN to identify individuals with MCI. Quantitative imaging metrics provided superior decision support than demographic data. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.