ArticleAnnals of pediatric cardiology
Progressive changes in residual gradient after aortic coarctation repair and its role in the prediction of reintervention: A longitudinal data analysis.
Article in Annals of pediatric cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distal Transverse Arch Dimensions Dictate Long-Term Aortic Arch Gradients Following Coarctation of the Aorta Repair During Early Infancy.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes after coarctation surgery in a pediatric population at Heart Center Leipzig - A two-decade experience.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
- Evaluation of Subclinical Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Adults with Repaired Aortic Coarctation.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Repair of aortic coarctation through left thoracotomy is the standard treatment when anatomically feasible. Long-term outcomes are well studied, including the need for reintervention. However, the timely variation in residual gradients across the repaired segment is ill-defined. The aim of this work was to study the progressive changes of estimated peak gradient (ePG) acquired by transthoracic continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography across the aortic arch after repair and to assess the role of timing of assessment and values of ePG in prediction of reintervention. Materials and Methods: All eligible patients for this study who underwent aortic coarctation repair through left thoracotomy from 2001 to 2017 were reviewed. Details of the aortic arch dimensions and associated lesions were obtained by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The primary outcome was the ePG across the aortic arch after repair. Longitudinal data analyses with mixed effect modeling were used to determine independent predictors for ePGs. Results: A total of 312 patients were included. Median age and weight were 30 days and 4 kg, respectively. Associated lesions included ventricular septal defect (VSD) (53%), bicuspid aortic valve (53%) and mitral stenosis (25%). Over 15-years follow-up the freedom from reintervention was 92.3%, while 24 out of the 312 patients underwent reintervention (7.7%). Longitudinal data analyses of serial 2566 TTE studies were done. The graphical display showed that the ePG across coarctation area in the first postoperative TTE was the most notable difference between those who underwent reintervention and those who did not. Further testing with proportional hazard and logistic regression modeling confirmed this finding. The area under receiver operating curve statistics showed that an ePG of 25 mmHg is an optimal cutoff value for the prediction of the reintervention. Conclusions: The ePG acquired in the first postoperative TTE is the most important predictor for reinterventions. The presence of VSD is associated with decreased ePGs. We propose that an ePG in the first postoperative TTE of 25 mmHg or more is a strong predictor for the need of reintervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.