Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37876934›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2023

Advances in immunotyping of colorectal cancer.

Yinhang Wu, Jing Zhuang, Zhanbo Qu, Xi Yang, Shuwen Han

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yinhang WuHuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital HuZhou University, Huzhou, China.
Jing ZhuangHuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital HuZhou University, Huzhou, China.
Zhanbo QuHuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital HuZhou University, Huzhou, China.
Xi YangHuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital HuZhou University, Huzhou, China.
Shuwen HanHuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital HuZhou University, Huzhou, China.
Huzhou Central Hospital · CNHuzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has transformed treatment for various types of malignancy. However, the benefit of immunotherapy is limited to a minority of patients with mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) (dMMR-MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC). Understanding the complexity and heterogeneity of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and identifying immune-related CRC subtypes will improve antitumor immunotherapy. Here, we review the current status of immunotherapy and typing schemes for CRC. Immune subtypes have been identified based on TIME and prognostic gene signatures that can both partially explain clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors and the prognosis of patients with CRC. Identifying immune subtypes will improve understanding of complex CRC tumor heterogeneity and refine current immunotherapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsImmunotherapyBrain NeoplasmsHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryPrognosisTumor Microenvironmentcolorectal cancercolorectal cancer subtypesimmune subtypeimmunotherapytumor immune microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37876934
PMCPMC10590894
OpenAlexW4387457995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.