Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37876932›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Distinct anti-NP, anti-RBD and anti-Spike antibody profiles discriminate death from survival in COVID-19.

Carolina do Prado Servian, Mônica Spadafora-Ferreira, Déborah Carolina Carvalho Dos Anjos, Adriana Oliveira Guilarde, Antonio Roberto Gomes-Junior, Moara Alves Santa Bárbara Borges, Letícia Carrijo Masson, João Marcos Maia Silva, Matheus Henrique Assis de Lima, Brenda Grazielli Nogueira Moraes and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Carolina do Prado ServianDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Mônica Spadafora-FerreiraLaboratório de Imunogenética, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Déborah Carolina Carvalho Dos AnjosDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Adriana Oliveira GuilardeDepartamento de Patologia Tropical e Dermatologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Antonio Roberto Gomes-JuniorDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Moara Alves Santa Bárbara BorgesDepartamento de Patologia Tropical e Dermatologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Letícia Carrijo MassonDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
João Marcos Maia SilvaDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Matheus Henrique Assis de LimaVigilância Epidemiológica da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Goiânia, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Brenda Grazielli Nogueira MoraesHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Sueli Meira SouzaLaboratório Profa Margarida Dobler Komma, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Luiz Eterno XavierHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Denise Cristina André de OliveiraLaboratório de Virologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
João Victor Batalha-CarvalhoLaboratório de Biofármacos, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana Maria MoroLaboratório de Biofármacos, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Anamélia Lorenzetti BoccaDepartamento de Biologia Celular, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Irmtraut Araci Hoffmann PfrimerEscola de Ciências Médicas e da Vida, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Nádia Lago CostaFaculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Valéria Christina de Rezende FeresFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Fabiola Souza FiaccadoriDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Menira SouzaDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Luiz Gustavo GardinassiDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Edison Luiz DurigonDepartamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Pedro Roosevelt Torres RomãoLaboratório de Imunologia Celular e Molecular, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biociências, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Soraia Attie Calil JorgeLaboratório de Biotecnologia Viral, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Verônica CoelhoInstituto de Investigação em Imunologia - Instituto Nacional de Ciências e Tecnologia (III-INCT), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Viviane Fongaro BotossoLaboratório de Virologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Simone Gonçalves FonsecaDepartamento de Biociências e Tecnologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BRInstituto Butantan · BRHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRInstituto Nacional de Tecnologia · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás · BRSecretaria Municipal de Saúde · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces rapid production of IgM, IgA, and IgG antibodies directed to multiple viral antigens that may have impact diverse clinical outcomes. Methods: We evaluated IgM, IgA, and IgG antibodies directed to the nucleocapsid (NP), IgA and IgG to the Spike protein and to the receptor-binding domain (RBD), and the presence of neutralizing antibodies (nAb), in a cohort of unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals, in the first 30 days of post-symptom onset (PSO) (T1). Results: This study included 193 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) participants classified as mild, moderate, severe, critical, and fatal and 27 uninfected controls. In T1, we identified differential antibody profiles associated with distinct clinical presentation. The mild group presented lower levels of anti-NP IgG, and IgA (vs moderate and severe), anti-NP IgM (vs severe, critical and fatal), anti-Spike IgA (vs severe and fatal), and anti-RBD IgG (vs severe). The moderate group presented higher levels of anti-RBD IgA, comparing with severe group. The severe group presented higher levels of anti-NP IgA (vs mild and fatal) and anti-RBD IgG (vs mild and moderate). The fatal group presented higher levels of anti-NP IgM and anti-Spike IgA (vs mild), but lower levels of anti-NP IgA (vs severe). The levels of nAb was lower just in mild group compared to severe, critical, and fatal groups, moreover, no difference was observed among the more severe groups. In addition, we studied 82 convalescent individuals, between 31 days to 6 months (T2) or more than 6 months (T3), PSO, those: 12 mild, 26 moderate, and 46 severe plus critical. The longitudinal analyzes, for the severe plus critical group showed lower levels of anti-NP IgG, IgA and IgM, anti-Spike IgA in relation T3. The follow-up in the fatal group, reveals that the levels of anti-spike IgG increased, while anti-NP IgM levels was decreased along the time in severe/critical and fatal as well as anti-NP IgG and IgA in several/critical groups. Discussion: In summary, the anti-NP IgA and IgG lower levels and the higher levels of anti-RBD and anti-Spike IgA in fatal compared to survival group of individuals admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Collectively, our data discriminate death from survival, suggesting that anti-RBD IgA and anti-Spike IgA may play some deleterious effect, in contrast with the potentially protective effect of anti-NP IgA and IgG in the survival group.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MNucleocapsidSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin Mantibodiesclinical severityCOVID-19nucleocapsid protein (N)receptor binding domain (RBD)SARS-CoV-2spike protein (S)

Identifiers

PMID37876932
PMCPMC10591157
OpenAlexW4387454258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.