Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37876906›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Validating a re-implementation of an algorithm to integrate transcriptome and ChIP-seq data.

Mahmoud Ahmed, Deok Ryong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mahmoud AhmedDepartment of Biochemistry and Convergence Medical Sciences and Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4377-6541
Deok Ryong KimDepartment of Biochemistry and Convergence Medical Sciences and Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factor binding to a gene regulatory region induces or represses its expression. Binding and expression target analysis (BETA) integrates the binding and gene expression data to predict this function. First, the regulatory potential of the factor is modeled based on the distance of its binding sites from the transcription start sites in a decay function. Then the differential expression statistics from an experiment where this factor was perturbed represent the binding effect. The rank product of the two values is employed to order in importance. This algorithm was originally implemented in Python. We reimplemented the algorithm in R to take advantage of existing data structures and other tools for downstream analyses. Here, we attempted to replicate the findings in the original BETA paper. We applied the new implementation to the same datasets using default and varying inputs and cutoffs. We successfully replicated the original results. Moreover, we showed that the method was appropriately influenced by varying the input and was robust to choices of cutoffs in statistical testing.

Indexed as

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingTranscriptomeAlgorithmsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorsCompetitive-bindingCooperative-bindingDNA-bindingReproducible-researchR-packageTranscription-factor

Identifiers

PMID37876906
PMCPMC10592348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.