Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37876886›Full record

ArticleCJC open2023

The Need for

Eloisa Colin-Ramirez, Wendimagegn Alemayehu, Finlay A McAlister, Jonathan G Howlett, Benjamin P Willing, Andrew Forgie, Karen Madsen, Jason R B Dyck, Justin A Ezekowitz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03409926 (The Need for FibEr Addition in SympTomatic Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03409926 nacompletednot on this map

The Need for FibEr Addition in SympTomatic Heart Failure

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2018 to 2022Enrolled51ConditionsHeart FailureArmsAcacia Gum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eloisa Colin-RamirezUniversidad Anáhuac México, Huixquilucan, Mexico.
Wendimagegn AlemayehuCanadian VIGOUR Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Finlay A McAlisterCanadian VIGOUR Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jonathan G HowlettLibin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Benjamin P WillingDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Andrew ForgieDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Karen MadsenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jason R B DyckCardiovascular Research Centre, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Justin A EzekowitzCanadian VIGOUR Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAUniversidad Anáhuac · MXUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preclinical and observational studies suggest that the gut microbiome plays a role in the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF); the gut microbiome may be modified by fermentable dietary fibre (FDF). The Need for Methods: Participants were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to either of the intervention arms (5 g/d or 10 g/d acacia) or to the control arm (10 g/d microcrystalline cellulose (MCC; nonfermentable active control). Adherence and tolerance were assessed, and clinical events were monitored for safety. All outcomes (NT-proBNP, ST2, New York Heart Association class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, 6-minute walk test score, gut microbiome) were measured at baseline, and at 6 and 12 weeks. Results: Between September 13, 2018 and December 16, 2021, 51 patients were randomly allocated to either MCC (n = 18), acacia 5 g daily (n = 13), or acacia 10 g daily (n = 18). No differences occurred between either dose of acacia and MCC in NT-proBNP level, ST2, New York Heart Association class, or questionnaire scores over 12 weeks. Dietary treatment arms had a negligible impact on microbial communities. No safety, tolerability, or adherence issues were observed. Conclusions: Dietary supplementation with acacia gum was both safe and well tolerated in ambulatory patients with HF; however, it did not change NT-proBNP level, ST2, or the composition of the gut microbiome.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03409926.

Identifiers

PMID37876886
PMCPMC10591131
OpenAlexW4384701213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.