ArticleCJC open2023
The Effect of Glycemic Control on Left Ventricular Function in Clinical and Experimental Diabetes.
Article in CJC open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of glycemic optimization on myocardial steatosis and cardiac remodeling in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- The impact of diabetes duration and glycemic control on ejection fraction in heart failure patients.Acta diabetologica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glycemic control in diabetes mellitus (DM) has not improved cardiovascular outcomes with normal left ventricular (LV) function. We assessed the effect on LV dysfunction using a canine model of LV dysfunction and DM, and in patients with DM and LV dysfunction. Methods: Chronic LV dysfunction was produced by coronary microsphere embolization in 34 canines (15-25 kg). Following 8 weeks of stabilization, DM was induced in 24 canines and randomized to good or poor glycemic control for 3 months. Ten canines without DM were controls. Hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic data were obtained prior to and following pressure loading. We reviewed the Doppler-echocardiography at baseline and follow-up in 207 patients with DM with reduced ejection fraction (EF; median follow-up = 612 days) and 60 age- and sex-matched non-DM patients with normal EF. Laboratory results, medications, and incident adverse events from medical records were obtained Results: EF = 43.8% ± 11.2% for all canines at 8 weeks. Canines with Conclusions: Poor glycemic control had an adverse effect on preexisting LV dysfunction experimentally and in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.