ArticleiScience2023
A multi-center performance assessment for automated histopathological classification and grading of glioma using whole slide images.
Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- StarMA Net: A star-shape multi-scale attention network for medical imaging classification.iScience · 2025Article
- Mucin phenotype-based deep learning framework for intestinal metaplasia-carcinogenesis progression prediction.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Digital Pathology with AI for Cervical Biopsies: Diagnostic Accuracy at the CIN2+ Threshold.Cancers · 2025Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in the analysis of histopathology images of gliomas: a review.Npj imaging · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate pathological classification and grading of gliomas is crucial in clinical diagnosis and treatment. The application of deep learning techniques holds promise for automated histological pathology diagnosis. In this study, we collected 733 whole slide images from four medical centers, of which 456 were used for model training, 150 for internal validation, and 127 for multi-center testing. The study includes 5 types of common gliomas. A subtask-guided multi-instance learning image-to-label training pipeline was employed. The pipeline leveraged "patch prompting" for the model to converge with reasonable computational cost. Experiments showed that an overall accuracy of 0.79 in the internal validation dataset. The performance on the multi-center testing dataset showed an overall accuracy to 0.73. The findings suggest a minor yet acceptable performance decrease in multi-center data, demonstrating the model's strong generalizability and establishing a robust foundation for future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.