Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37876780›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Marie Colette, Linda Guentas, Luc Della Patrona, Dominique Ansquer, Nolwenn Callac

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Diving into Diversity:PhytoKeys · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie ColetteFrench Institute for Research in the Science of the Sea (IFREMER), Research Institute for Development (IRD), University of New Caledonia, University of Reunion, CNRS, UMR 9220 ENTROPIE, Nouméa, New Caledonia.
Linda GuentasInstitute of Exact and Applied Sciences (ISEA), University of New Caledonia, Nouméa, New Caledonia.
Luc Della PatronaFrench Institute for Research in the Science of the Sea (IFREMER), Research Institute for Development (IRD), University of New Caledonia, University of Reunion, CNRS, UMR 9220 ENTROPIE, Nouméa, New Caledonia.
Dominique AnsquerFrench Institute for Research in the Science of the Sea (IFREMER), Research Institute for Development (IRD), University of New Caledonia, University of Reunion, CNRS, UMR 9220 ENTROPIE, Nouméa, New Caledonia.
Nolwenn CallacFrench Institute for Research in the Science of the Sea (IFREMER), Research Institute for Development (IRD), University of New Caledonia, University of Reunion, CNRS, UMR 9220 ENTROPIE, Nouméa, New Caledonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shrimp rearing generate organic waste that is trapped in the pond sediment. In excess, these wastes may impair aquaculture ecosystem and shrimps' health. To promote the biological oxidation of accumulated organic waste, the pond is drained and dried at the end of each production cycle. However, this practice is not always conducive to maintaining microbial decomposition activities in sediments. Shrimp production in New Caledonia is no exception to this problem of pollution of pond bottoms. One promising way of treating this waste would be bioremediation, using a native halophyte plant and its microbiota. Thus, this study explored the nutrient removal potential of

Indexed as

active rhizosphere microbiotaearthen pond sedimenthalophytemetabarcodingnutrient removal

Identifiers

PMID37876780
PMCPMC10591223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.