Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37876769›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2023

Implementation of a piritramide based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) as a standard of care for pain control in late abortion induction: A prospective cohort study from a patient perspective.

L Tascón Padrón, N L A Emrich, B Strizek, A Gass, C Link, T Hilbert, S Klaschik, W Meissner, U Gembruch, J Jiménez Cruz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L Tascón PadrónDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
N L A EmrichDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
B StrizekDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
A GassDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
C LinkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
T HilbertDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
S KlaschikDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
W MeissnerDepartment for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine/Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital of Jena, 07740 Jena, Germany.
U GembruchDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
J Jiménez CruzDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DEJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether the implementation of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with piritramide using an automatic pump system under routine conditions is effective to reduce pain in late abortion inductions. Study design: Prospective observational cohort study. Setting: Patients requiring medically indicated abortion induction from 14 weeks of pregnancy onwards between July 2019 and July 2020 at the department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine of the Bonn University Hospital in Germany. Methods: Evaluation of pain management after implementation of a PCA system compared with previous nurse-controlled tramadol-based standard under routine conditions. Patients answered a validated pain questionnaire and requirement of rescue analgesics was assessed. Pain intensity and satisfaction were measured on a ten-point numeric rating scale. Main Outcome Measure Maximal pain intensity. Results: Forty patients were included. Patients using Piritramide-PCA complained of higher pain sores than those in the standard group (6.90 (± 2.34) vs. 4.83 (± 2.87), (p < 0.05)). In both groups the level of satisfaction with the analgesia received was comparable (8.00 (± 2.45) vs 7.67 (± 2.62), (p = 0.7)). Patients in the PCA group suffered more nausea (63.2 % vs 30 % respectively, OR 4.0, 95 % CI 1.05-15.20, p < 0.05) and expressed more the desire for more analgesic support compared to the control group (OR 5.7 (1-33.25), p = 0.05). Conclusion: Women with abortion induction after 14 weeks of gestation suffer from relevant severe pain, which requires adequate therapy. However, addition of PCA does not seem to bring any advantage in patients undergoing this procedure.

Indexed as

Late abortion inductionMedically-indicated termination of pregnancyObstetrical painPain managementPatient-controlled analgesia

Identifiers

PMID37876769
PMCPMC10590719
OpenAlexW4387576414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.