Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37876674›Full record

ReviewLancet regional health. Americas2023

A critical analysis of national plans for climate adaptation for health in South America.

Valerie A Paz-Soldán, Ariana Valcarcel, Katya Canal-Solis, Zaray Miranda-Chacon, Yasna K Palmeiro-Silva, Stella M Hartinger, Ana G Suárez-Linares, Valeria Falla-Valdez, Claudio Intimayta-Escalante, Mariana Lehoucq and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The 2025Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The 2023 Latin America report of theLancet regional health. Americas · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Valerie A Paz-SoldánTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Ariana ValcarcelDelft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Katya Canal-SolisUniversity of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, UK.
Zaray Miranda-ChaconAnatomy Department, School of Medicine, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Yasna K Palmeiro-SilvaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Stella M HartingerSchool of Public Health and Management "Carlos Vidal Layseca", Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Ana G Suárez-LinaresSchool of Public Health and Management "Carlos Vidal Layseca", Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Valeria Falla-ValdezSchool of Public Health and Management "Carlos Vidal Layseca", Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Claudio Intimayta-EscalanteSchool of Public Health and Management "Carlos Vidal Layseca", Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Mariana LehoucqSchool of Public Health and Management "Carlos Vidal Layseca", Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Angelica PretellSchool of Public Health and Management "Carlos Vidal Layseca", Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Ricardo Castillo-NeyraDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEDelft University of Technology · NLTulane University · USUniversidad de Costa Rica · CRUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate adaptation measures are critical for protecting human health. National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), and National Communications (NCs) play a crucial role in helping countries identify, analyze, and address their vulnerabilities to climate change impacts, while also assessing available resources and capacities. This study aimed to assess the comprehensiveness of South American countries' NAPs, NDCs, and NCs in addressing the effects of climate change on health. A total of 38 NAPs, NDCs, and NCs of 12 South American countries were analysed. Ad hoc scores were developed to assess baseline information, adaptation proposals, identification of involved institutions, funding needs and allocation, measurable progress indicators, and coherence. Overall, all South American countries have NDCs and NCs, and seven have NAPs. In most countries, the intersectoral health analysis revealed a lack of linkage to health issues related to that sector. Additionally, most planning documents lack detailed information to guide policymakers in taking practical actions; areas with low scores include allocation of funds, involvement of health-related institutions, and measurable indicators. While South American countries acknowledge the health impacts of climate change in their plans, enhancing public health protection requires maximizing climate policy benefits and including health-related issues across all relevant sectors. Funding: This study was not funded. However, three co-authors received funding for some of their time: AV and KC were supported by the Wellcome Trust (209734/Z/17/Z); RCN was funded by K01AI139284 (NIH-NIAID). Funding for the publication was provided by Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.

Indexed as

Climate adaptationClimate changeGlobal healthHealthHealth policyPolicy analysisPublic policySouth AmericaVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID37876674
PMCPMC10593566
OpenAlexW4387449012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.