Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37876667›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2023

A scoping review of the health co-benefits of climate mitigation strategies in South America.

Daniel Fernandez-Guzman, Romina Lavarello, Marisol Yglesias-González, Stella M Hartinger, David Rojas-Rueda

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Infrastructure-health nexus in Brazil: a scoping review.Global health research and policy · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The 2023 Latin America report of theLancet regional health. Americas · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. TheLancet regional health. Americas · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel Fernandez-GuzmanCarrera de Medicina Humana, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru.
Romina LavarelloFacultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru.
Marisol Yglesias-GonzálezCentro Latinoamericano de Excelencia en Cambio Climático y Salud, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Stella M HartingerSchool of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
David Rojas-RuedaDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Universidad Científica del Sur · PEColorado School of Public Health · USSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PE

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accelerated production of greenhouse gases (GHG) due to human activity has led to unprecedented global warming, making climate mitigation strategies crucial for minimizing its impacts. South America, a region highly vulnerable to climate change, stands to benefit from implementing such strategies to reduce future risks and generate health co-benefits. This scoping review, aimed to assess the existing evidence on the health benefits of climate mitigation strategies in South American countries. PubMed, Web of Science, and LILACS databases were searched until June 15, 2023. Nine studies published between 2001 and 2021 were analyzed, focusing on Brazil, Chile, and Bolivia. All the studies identified in this review used scenario modeling. They evaluated various GHG emission mitigation strategies, including land management, reducing livestock production, biofuel production, increased active transportation, renewable energy, and waste reduction. Only one study looked at GHG capture and sequestration through afforestation. Given the limited information available, there is a pressing need for more research on the region's potential health, environmental, and economic co-benefits. This review serves as a starting point and suggests that climate mitigation can offer a range of positive co-benefits, such as improved air quality and increased resilience to climate impacts, thereby advancing public health initiatives. Funding: MYG was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant number 209734/Z/17/Z). The other authors did not receive financial support for their research or authorship. The publication of this article was financially supported by Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.

Indexed as

BoliviaBrazilChileClimate changeHealthMitigationSouth America

Identifiers

PMID37876667
PMCPMC10593577
OpenAlexW4386918047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.