Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37876565›Full record

SynthesisMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2023

The Efficacy and Safety of Using Opioids in Acute Pancreatitis: an Update on Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohamed Almulhim, Qasem Ahmed Almulihi, Hamzah Sadiq Almumtin, Mohammed Hajay Alghanim, Doaa Ali AlAbdulbaqi, Fatimah Ahmed Ali Almulihi

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Acute pancreatitis: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Management of acute pancreatitis in the "no man's land".Internal and emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of severe acute pancreatitis. Evidence based medicine (EBM) clinical practice guidelines.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  9. Contemporary Approach to Acute Pancreatitis in Emergency Medicine.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. How safe are opioids in the early phase of acute pancreatitis?United European gastroenterology journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed AlmulhimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Qasem Ahmed AlmulihiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Hamzah Sadiq AlmumtinDepartment, King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain.
Mohammed Hajay AlghanimDepartment, King Fahad Hospital, Hofuf , Saudi Arabia.
Doaa Ali AlAbdulbaqiNursing at Qateef Central Hospital, Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah Ahmed Ali AlmulihiNursing at Alomran General Hospital, Saudi Arabia.
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Most patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) suffer from abdominal pain that requires immediate pain relief, and there are various medication choices available, with opioids being the most prescribed analgesics. Objective: Our objective is to compare the use of opioids with other medications in emergency settings for managing pain in patients with AP. Methods: A systemic search was conducted in electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Google Scholar) from inception to Feb 2023. All statistical analyses were conducted in Review Manager 5.4.1. The study's inclusion criteria was then selected. Only those Randomized Controlled Trials were involved that included patients having AP in an emergency setting. A random-effect model was used when heterogeneity was seen to pool the studies, and the result was reported in the Odds Ratio (OR) and Mean Difference (MD) along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Narrative analysis was conducted for those variables which did not have sufficient data be included in the quantitative analysis. Results: We include eight Randomized Controlled Trials in our study. The Pooled result showed non-significant differences in adverse effects between the two interventions (OR 1.42 [95% CI 0.62, 3.23]; p value= 0.40; I2= 20%). While overall, significantly additional drugs were used in the control group (OR 0.22 [95% CI 0.06, 0.85]; p value= 0.03; I2= 72%). Pain score and severity levels were also analyzed. We used a narrative approach to analyze the length of stay, mean time to reach significant decrease in pain, and mortality, which were all non-conclusive. We also narratively assessed the Pediatric population. Conclusion: Opioids do not provide significant superiority over other medications and should be avoided due to their addictive nature.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidPancreatitisAcute DiseaseChildHumansPainPain ManagementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidAcute PancreatitisEmergencyOpioids

Identifiers

PMID37876565
PMCPMC10591254
OpenAlexW4386190142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.