ArticleMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2023
Does a Low Score in the Respiratory Visual Triage Tool Predict a Negative COVID-19 Test in an Admitted Patient?
Article in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fast and accurate COVID-19 identification is important to population and epidemic monitoring in hospitals. Visual triage or respiratory triage should be efficient and utilized as visual clues to alert HCWs on the case definitions. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of the respiratory triage for COVID-19 infections and to evaluate the efficacy of the MOH triage tool in identifying low risk patients. Methods: A single-center retrospective chart review that was conducted at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU), Khober, KSA on all adult patients admitted to the hospital through the ED. The visual triage checklist comprises two main sections, with one focused on the risk of exposure and the other related to patient clinical signs and symptoms, each with a defined score where any score ≥ 4 will need to isolate and assessed by the physician while a score of less than 4 means that the patient can be admitted with other patients. The hospital swabbed all admitted patients regardless of their score. We compared their PCR result with their case definition score. The collected data was entered and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) version 23. Results: The study included 7258 participants. 20% of participants aged between 21 to 30 years old, 52.2% of sample were females, and 78% were Saudi nationality. Visual triage score was less than 4 in n= 4745 participants (65.4%) and 4 or more in n= 2513 (34.6%). The test had sensitivity of 75% and specificity 21%. Conclusion: Most studies shows that COVID 19 has an infectivity rate of 18 to 30%. Based on this low sensitivity result, using the screening tool alone puts patients and HCWs at risk of getting infected with COVID 19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.