ArticleHeliyon2023
Carbon isotope effects in the sorption of chlorinated ethenes on biochar and activated carbon.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measurement Uncertainty and Risk of False Compliance Assessment Applied to Carbon Isotopic Analyses in Natural Gas Exploratory Evaluation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As an alternative to activated carbon, biochar is a promising, environmentally friendly sorbent that can be used to remove organic groundwater pollutants, such as chlorinated ethenes (CEs). Stable isotope fractionation in biofilters is used to quantify pollutant degradation and to distinguish degradation from pollutant sorption on e.g. biochar. However, the sorption of CEs on biochar, and the potential abiotic fractionation processes remain to be tested. The sorption process of CEs and ethene on activated carbon and biochar was investigated with regard to the isotope effects for the differentiation from microbial degradation processes. Results from physical and chemical characterization of biochar indicated that biochar feedstock and pyrolysis conditions determined sorption performance depending on the surface chemistry and the pore size distribution of the coarse sorbent particles. The sorption capacity of the activated carbon was significantly higher with highly chlorinated ethenes, but similar to the biochars with low chlorination. Apparent carbon isotope fractionation factors (ε) of +0.1 to -4.4 ‰ were found above measurement uncertainties of GC/IRMS. The extent of isotope enrichment of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.