Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37876373›Full record

ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2023

Study protocol for TARGET protein: The effect of augmented administration of enteral protein to critically ill adults on clinical outcomes: A cluster randomised, cross-sectional, double cross-over, clinical trial.

Matthew J Summers, Lee-Anne S Chapple, Rinaldo Bellomo, Marianne J Chapman, Suzie Ferrie, Mark E Finnis, Craig French, Sally Hurford, Nima Kakho, Amalia Karahalios and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Critical care nutrition and the legacy of Rinaldo Bellomo.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Matthew J SummersIntensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lee-Anne S ChappleIntensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoIntensive Care Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Marianne J ChapmanIntensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Suzie FerrieDepartment of Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark E FinnisIntensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Craig FrenchIntensive Care Unit, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sally HurfordMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Nima KakhoIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Amalia KarahaliosCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Matthew J MaidenIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Stephanie N O'ConnorIntensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Sandra L PeakeDiscipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jeffrey J PresneillAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emma J RidleyAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
An Tran-DuyCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Patricia J WilliamsDiscipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Paul J YoungDepartment of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sophie ZaloumisCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Adam M DeaneIntensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
TARGET Protein Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is unknown whether increasing dietary protein to 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day as recommended in international guidelines compared to current practice improves outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The TARGET Protein trial will evaluate this. Objective: To describe the study protocol for the TARGET Protein trial. Design setting and participants: TARGET Protein is a cluster randomised, cross-sectional, double cross-over, pragmatic clinical trial undertaken in eight ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Each ICU will be randomised to use one of two trial enteral formulae for three months before crossing over to the other formula, which is then repeated, with enrolment continuing at each ICU for 12 months. All patients aged ≥16 years in their index ICU admission commencing enteral nutrition will be eligible for inclusion. Eligible patients will receive the trial enteral formula to which their ICU is allocated. The two trial enteral formulae are isocaloric with a difference in protein dose: intervention 100g/1000 ml and comparator 63g/1000 ml. Staggered recruitment commenced in May 2022. Main outcomes measures: The primary outcome is days free of the index hospital and alive at day 90. Secondary outcomes include days free of the index hospital at day 90 in survivors, alive at day 90, duration of invasive ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, incidence of tracheostomy insertion, renal replacement therapy, and discharge destination. Conclusion: TARGET Protein aims to determine whether augmented enteral protein delivery reduces days free of the index hospital and alive at day 90. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621001484831).

Indexed as

Clinical OutcomesCritical IllnessDietary ProteinEnteral NutritionNutrition Therapy

Identifiers

PMID37876373
PMCPMC10581259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.