ArticleThe Permanente journal2023
Use of Metaphor as an Explanation Tool in Adverse Childhood Experiences Simulation Training.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring Patient Preferences for Adverse Childhood Experiences Education in the Primary Care Setting: A Focus Group Study.The Permanente journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have profound implications for adult health. Health care practitioners need effective communication tools for trauma-sensitive inquiries with patients. This study aimed to describe characteristics of effective metaphor use by health care trainees when discussing ACEs and health with adult patients, and to provide example metaphors for clinicians to use to sensitively address ACEs.
methodsTrainees engaged in a videorecorded simulation as part of a model to teach health care practitioners communication skills related to ACEs. Videos were identified in which the trainee used a metaphor to help explain ACEs during the encounter. Encounter segments that used metaphors were transcribed and metaphor type, duration, and recurrence were coded using a standardized rubric. Each metaphor was scored for effectiveness and basic statistical analysis was conducted.
resultsOf the 122 videos reviewed, 24 types of metaphors were used, with the most common being the overloaded backpack (n = 24). Mean metaphor duration was 37 s (SD = 24 s). Metaphors rated as effective were shorter and less variable in duration (31.8 s, SD = 14.7 s) than those rated as ineffective (39 s, SD = 34 s). No one metaphor performed significantly better and most of the metaphors were evaluated as being adequate or effective.
conclusionLiterary devices like metaphors may be efficient and effective explanatory tools to improve clinician communication skills and patient understanding in addressing sensitive topics, such as ACEs. Minimal time investment is required to employ metaphors in ACEs discussions. The authors found no single metaphor that to be clearly superior, indicating that patient-centered metaphor use may improve communication between clinicians and patients who experienced childhood trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.