Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37876188›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Reproductive tactics, birth timing and the risk-resource trade-off in an income breeder.

Laura Benoit, Nicolas Morellet, Nadège C Bonnot, Bruno Cargnelutti, Yannick Chaval, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Anne Loison, Bruno Lourtet, Pascal Marchand, Aurélie Coulon and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura BenoitUniversité de Toulouse, INRAE, CEFS, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4463-2715
Nicolas MorelletUniversité de Toulouse, INRAE, CEFS, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Nadège C BonnotUniversité de Toulouse, INRAE, CEFS, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Bruno CargneluttiUniversité de Toulouse, INRAE, CEFS, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Yannick ChavalUniversité de Toulouse, INRAE, CEFS, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Jean-Michel GaillardLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive UMR 5558, CNRS, Université Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
Anne LoisonLaboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont-Blanc, CNRS, LECA, 38058 Grenoble, France.
Bruno LourtetUniversité de Toulouse, INRAE, CEFS, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Pascal MarchandOffice Français de la Biodiversité, Direction de la Recherche et de l'Appui Scientifique, Service Anthropisation et Fonctionnement des Ecosystèmes Terrestres, 147 avenue de Lodève, Les Portes du Soleil, 34990 Juvignac, France.
Aurélie CoulonCentre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Sorbonne Université, CP 135, 57 rue Cuvier 75005 Paris, France.
A J Mark HewisonUniversité de Toulouse, INRAE, CEFS, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2276-4154
Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRFondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In variable environments, habitats that are rich in resources often carry a higher risk of predation. As a result, natural selection should favour individuals that balance allocation of time to foraging versus avoiding predation through an optimal decision-making process that maximizes fitness. The behavioural trade-off between resource acquisition and risk avoidance is expected to be particularly acute during gestation and lactation, when the energetic demands of reproduction peak. Here, we investigated how reproductive female roe deer adjust their foraging activity and habitat use during the birth period to manage this trade-off compared with non-reproductive juveniles, and how parturition date constrains individual tactics of risk-resource management. Activity of reproductive females more than doubled immediately following parturition, when energy demand is highest. Furthermore, compared with non-reproductive juveniles, they increased their exposure to risk by using open habitat more during daytime and ranging closer to roads. However, these post-partum modifications in behaviour were particularly pronounced in late-parturient females who adopted a more risk-prone tactic, presumably to compensate for the growth handicap of their late-born offspring. In income breeders, individuals that give birth late may be constrained to trade risk avoidance for foraging during peak allocation to reproduction, with probable consequences for individual fitness.

Indexed as

DeerAnimalsEcosystemFemaleHumansPredatory BehaviorReproductionactivityagricultural habitatgrowth handicapparturitionrisk-proneungulate

Identifiers

PMID37876188
PMCPMC10598439
OpenAlexW4387931012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.