Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875984›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2023

Effects of time-restricted eating with different eating windows on human metabolic health: pooled analysis of existing cohorts.

Zhongbiao Nie, Jiaming Xu, Yinchu Cheng, Zhihong Li, Ran Zhang, Wentao Zhang, Libo Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The year in nutrition medicine 2023.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhongbiao NieDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jiaming XuDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yinchu ChengDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zhihong LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030032, China.
Ran ZhangNephrology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Taiyuan, 030036, China.
Wentao ZhangPharmacy Department, Beijing hospital of Integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, 100039, China.
Libo ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. libozhao2011@163.com.
Peking University · CNBeijing Chang'an Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital · CNShanxi Medical University · CNShanxi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTime-restricted eating (TRE), a feasible form of intermittent fasting, has been proven to benefit metabolic health in animal models and humans. To our knowledge, specific guidance on the appropriate period for eating during TRE has not yet been promoted. Therefore, to compare and assess the relative effectiveness estimates and rankings of TRE with different eating windows on human metabolic health, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).

methodPubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared different eating windows on human metabolic health for adults. A Bayesian NMA was used to compare direct and indirect effects to determine the best different eating windows, and scientific evidence using GRADE.

resultsTwenty-seven RCTs comparing TRE with different eating windows on human metabolic health were reviewed, and all were included in the NMA. Compared with the normal diet group (non-TRE), the TRE group has certain benefits in reducing weight and fasting insulin. In terms of reducing fasting insulin, the 18:6 group (eating time = 6 h) was better than the 14:10 group (eating time = 10 h) and 16:8 group (eating time = 8 h) (P < 0.05); The < 6 group (eating time < 6 h) was better than the 14:10 group (P < 0.05). In terms of reducing fasting glucose, the < 6 group was better than the 14:10 group (P < 0.05). There were no statistical variations in weight, HDL, TG, and LDL across the different modes of TRE (P > 0.05).

conclusionsOur research showed that no particular metabolic advantages of various eating windows were found. Therefore, our results suggested that different eating windows could promote similar benefits for metabolic parameters.

Indexed as

Eating windowsExisting cohortsMetabolic healthPooled analysisTime-restricted eating

Identifiers

PMID37875984
PMCPMC10594936
OpenAlexW4387905921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.