Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875962›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

The Hans Kai trial: study protocol of a mixed methods randomized controlled trial evaluating a peer-led health promotion program for adults with or without noncommunicable diseases.

Margherita Cameranesi, Rebecca Mollard, Robert Balshaw, Dylan MacKay

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03949725 (Evaluating the Hans Kai Program for Canadian Adults Via an 18-month Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03949725 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating the Hans Kai Program for Canadian Adults Via an 18-month Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsMental Health, Social Isolation, Loneliness, Health-Related BehaviorArmsHans Kai Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Margherita CameranesiDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Manitoba, 110 RCFTR 196 Innovation Dr, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada. Margherita.Cameranesi@umanitoba.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5407-7693
Rebecca MollardChronic Disease Innovation Center, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6291-5439
Robert BalshawGeorge and Fee Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-8792
Dylan MacKayDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Manitoba, 110 RCFTR 196 Innovation Dr, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0751-1634
University of Manitoba · CAGeorge & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation · CASeven Oaks General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA significant proportion of Canadian adults is impacted by chronic noncommunicable diseases. These conditions may be improved by peer-led health promotion interventions that target modifiable risk factors; however, to date, there is mixed evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions. Unlike other health promotion programs, Hans Kai is grounded in a holistic model of health that simultaneously addresses multiple determinants of health at different levels of human ecology. In Hans Kai, a set of informational sessions that are delivered in a group setting by healthcare professionals are followed by regular peer-led group meetings in a self-governed support group setting that is designed to promote implementation of newly learned health competences. The Hans Kai trial described here aims to evaluate the efficacy of the Hans Kai program in promoting the health and wellbeing of its participants and investigate the experiences of the Hans Kai participants and facilitators.

methodsThis research will involve a mixed methods trial combining an experimental component with a qualitative component. The experimental component will involve a 6-month 2-group parallel superiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which 105 participants will be randomly assigned to two conditions, an intervention group (n = 70) that will participate in the Hans Kai program and a control group (n = 35) that will have access to standard care using a computer-generated random sequence; blinding will not occur. The RCT will test the impact of the program on several health outcomes and will be followed by a 12-18-month observational follow-up study that will provide data on the long-term durability of the 6-month RCT health outcomes. The qualitative component will investigate the experiences of program participants (n = 30) and facilitators (n = 15) to identify the main strengths and limitations of Hans Kai, uncover potential implementation issues, and elucidate the mechanisms through which the program works. The population of interest will include adults aged 18 + with or without chronic health conditions who self-report an interest in taking control of their own health and improving their lifestyle. In the RCT, all outcomes of interest will be measured using a multi-method approach, involving self-report questionnaires and objective indicators, and within-subject mean changes in outcomes over time between the two groups will be compared to address the RCT aims. Similarly, in the qualitative component, a multi-method approach, involving in-depth individual interviews, photovoice, and online surveys, will be used to reach a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the program strengths, how the program works, and for which people it is more effective. Adaptable components of the program will also be investigated and modified according to the feedback provided by the RCT participants. In the mixed methods integration of evidence, the qualitative findings will be used to explain the quantitative RCT results. DISCUSSION: The RCT findings will help support the further development and use of Hans Kai as well as other peer-led health promotion interventions.

trial registrationUnited Stated Clinical Trial Registry ClinicalTrials.gov (registration# NCT03949725; Protocol version 2, June 22nd, 2022).

Indexed as

Noncommunicable DiseasesAdultCanadaChronic DiseaseEquivalence Trials as TopicHealth PromotionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf-Help GroupsCanadaHealthHealth promotion interventionMixed methods randomized controlled trialProtocol

Identifiers

PMID37875962
PMCPMC10598963
OpenAlexW4387909161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.