Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875937›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2023

Real-time assessment of hypnotic depth, using an EEG-based brain-computer interface: a preliminary study.

Nikita V Obukhov, Peter L N Naish, Irina E Solnyshkina, Tatiana G Siourdaki, Ilya A Martynov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikita V ObukhovResearch Department, The Association of Experts in the Field of Clinical Hypnosis, 40, Kamennoostrovsky Ave., 410, Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation. onvion24@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-4005
Peter L N NaishDepartment of Psychology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8740-1963
Irina E SolnyshkinaDepartment of Psychotherapy, Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, 6-8, L. Tolstoy str, Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2856-7469
Tatiana G SiourdakiResearch Department, The Association of Experts in the Field of Clinical Hypnosis, 40, Kamennoostrovsky Ave., 410, Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-8905
Ilya A MartynovResearch Department, The Association of Experts in the Field of Clinical Hypnosis, 40, Kamennoostrovsky Ave., 410, Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4922-704X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHypnosis can be an effective treatment for many conditions, and there have been attempts to develop instrumental approaches to continuously monitor hypnotic state level ("depth"). However, there is no method that addresses the individual variability of electrophysiological hypnotic correlates. We explore the possibility of using an EEG-based passive brain-computer interface (pBCI) for real-time, individualised estimation of the hypnosis deepening process.

resultsThe wakefulness and deep hypnosis intervals were manually defined and labelled in 27 electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings obtained from eight outpatients after hypnosis sessions. Spectral analysis showed that EEG correlates of deep hypnosis were relatively stable in each patient throughout the treatment but varied between patients. Data from each first session was used to train classification models to continuously assess deep hypnosis probability in subsequent sessions. Models trained using four frequency bands (1.5-45, 1.5-8, 1.5-14, and 4-15 Hz) showed accuracy mostly exceeding 85% in a 10-fold cross-validation. Real-time classification accuracy was also acceptable, so at least one of the four bands yielded results exceeding 74% in any session. The best results averaged across all sessions were obtained using 1.5-14 and 4-15 Hz, with an accuracy of 82%. The revealed issues are also discussed.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesHypnosisElectroencephalographyHumansHypnotics and SedativesHypnotics and SedativesAwarenessBrain-computer interfaceHypnosisHypnotic depth assessmentSelf-awarenessSupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID37875937
PMCPMC10599062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.