Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875928›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Examining preconditions for integrated care: a comparative social network analysis of the structure and dynamics of strong relations in child service networks.

Mariëlle Blanken, Jolanda Mathijssen, Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen, Jörg Raab, Hans van Oers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariëlle BlankenTRANZO - Scientific center for care and wellbeing, Tilburg University, 5000 LE, Tilburg, PO BOX 90153, the Netherlands. m.blanken@tilburguniversity.edu.
Jolanda MathijssenTRANZO - Scientific center for care and wellbeing, Tilburg University, 5000 LE, Tilburg, PO BOX 90153, the Netherlands.
Chijs van NieuwenhuizenTRANZO - Scientific center for care and wellbeing, Tilburg University, 5000 LE, Tilburg, PO BOX 90153, the Netherlands.
Jörg RaabDepartment of Organization Studies, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, NL-5000 LE, Tilburg, P.O. Box 90153, The Netherlands.
Hans van OersTRANZO - Scientific center for care and wellbeing, Tilburg University, 5000 LE, Tilburg, PO BOX 90153, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo help ensure that children and families get the right support and services at the right time, strong and stable relationships between various child service organizations are vital. Moreover, strong and stable relationships and a key network position for gatekeepers are important preconditions for interprofessional collaboration, the timely and appropriate referral of clients, and improved health outcomes. Gatekeepers are organizations that have specific legal authorizations regarding client referral. However, it is largely unclear how strong relations in child service networks are structured, whether the gatekeepers have strong and stable relationships, and what the critical relations in the overall structure are. The aim of this study is to explore these preconditions for integrated care by examining the internal structure and dynamics of strong relations.

methodsA comparative case study approach and social network analysis of three inter-organizational networks consisting of 65 to 135 organizations within the Dutch child service system. Multiple network measures (number of active organizations, isolates, relations, average degree centrality, Lambda sets) were used to examine the strong relation structure and dynamics of the networks. Ucinet was used to analyze the data, with use of the statistical test: Quadratic Assignment Procedure. Visone was used to visualize the graphs of the networks.

resultsThis study shows that more than 80% of the organizations in the networks have strong relations. A striking finding is the extremely high number of strong relations that gatekeepers need to maintain. Moreover, the results show that the most important gatekeepers have key positions, and their strong relations are relatively stable. By contrast, considering the whole network, we also found a considerable measure of instability in strong relationships, which means that child service networks must cope with major internal dynamics.

conclusionsOur study addressed crucial preconditions for integrated care. The extremely high number of strong relations that particularly gatekeepers need to build and maintain, in combination with the considerable instability of strong relations considering the whole network, is a serious point of concern that need to be managed, in order to enable child service networks to improve internal coordination and integration of service delivery.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedSocial Network AnalysisChildHumansInterinstitutional RelationsReferral and ConsultationSocial NetworkingChild service delivery networksCritical relationsGatekeepersKey positionLongitudinal multiple case studiesPreconditions integrated care.QAP correlation procedureSocial network analysisStabilityStrong relations

Identifiers

PMID37875928
PMCPMC10598897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.