Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875926›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2023

Impact of a ground intermediate transport from the helicopter landing site at a hospital on transport duration and patient safety.

Dominik J Hoechter, Bjarne Schmalbach, Merve Schmidt, Stephan Prueckner, Andreas Bayer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cleared to land? A nationwide analysis of emergency care hospital and HEMS infrastructure in Germany.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dominik J HoechterDepartment of Anesthesiology, LMU Klinikum, University Hospital, Ludwig- Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377, Munich, Germany. dominik.hoechter@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4026-5137
Bjarne SchmalbachScientific research department, German Air Rescue Service Association "DRF Luftrettung", Rita-Maiburg-Straße 2, D-70794, Filderstadt, Germany.
Merve SchmidtScientific research department, German Air Rescue Service Association "DRF Luftrettung", Rita-Maiburg-Straße 2, D-70794, Filderstadt, Germany.
Stephan PruecknerGerman Air Rescue Service Association "DRF Luftrettung", air base Munich, Elisabeth-Stöber-Straße 71, D-81377, Munich, Germany.
Andreas BayerGerman Air Rescue Service Association "DRF Luftrettung", air base Munich, Elisabeth-Stöber-Straße 71, D-81377, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DELufthansa (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHelicopter emergency medical service provides timely care and rapid transport of severely injured or critically ill patients. Due to constructional or regulatory provisions at some hospitals, a remote helicopter landing site necessitates an intermediate ground transport to the emergency department by ambulance which might lengthen patient transport time and comprises the risk of disconnection or loss of vascular access lines, breathing tubes or impairment of other relevant equipment during the loading processes. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a ground intermediate transport at the hospital site prolonged patient transport times and operating times or increases complication rates.

methodsA retrospective analysis of all missions of a German air rescue service between 2012 and 2020 was conducted. Need of a ground transport at the accepting hospital, transfer time from the helipad to the hospital, overall patient transport time from the emergency location or the referring hospital to the accepting hospital and duration of the mission were analyzed. Several possible confounders such as type of mission, mechanical ventilation of the patient, use of syringe infusion pumps (SIPs), day- or nighttime were considered.

resultsOf a total of 179,003 missions (92,773 (51,8%) primary rescue missions, 10,001 (5,6%) polytrauma patients) 86,230 (48,2%) secondary transfers) an intermediate transport by ambulance occurred in 40,459 (22,6%) cases. While transfer times were prolonged from 6.3 to 8.8 min for primary rescue cases (p < 0.001) and from 9.2 to 13.5 min for interhospital retrieval missions (p < 0.001), the overall patient transport time was 14.8 versus 15.8 min (p < 0.001) in primary rescue and 23.5 versus 26.8 min (p < 0.001) in interhospital transfer. Linear regression analysis revealed a mean time difference of 3.91 min for mechanical ventilation of a patient (p < 0.001), 7.06 min for the use of SIPs (p < 0.001) and 2.73 min for an intermediate ambulance transfer (p < 0.001). There was no relevant difference of complication rates seen.

conclusionsAn intermediate ground transport from a remote helicopter landing site to the emergency department by ambulance at the receiving hospital had a minor impact on transportation times and complication rates.

Indexed as

Air AmbulancesEmergency Medical ServicesAircraftHospitalsHumansPatient SafetyRetrospective StudiesHelicopter emergency servicesHEMSIntermediate ground transportRemote helicopter landing siteTransportation duration

Identifiers

PMID37875926
PMCPMC10598984
OpenAlexW4387900844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.