SynthesisBMC health services research2023
eHealth literacy among hospital health care providers: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions to Enhance COVID-19 Pandemic Health Literacy in Health Professionals: Systematic Review.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Digital Health Literacy in Forced Migrant Populations: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating digital literacy of health professionals in Ethiopian health sectors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- eHealth literacy among hospital health care providers: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Why Nurses Intend to Override AI Alerts: How Alert Fatigue, Moral Distress, and Team Psychological Safety Shape Self-Reported Trust Calibration Toward Clinical Decision Support.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Self-Reported Digital Health Literacy and Work Engagement Among Nurses in UAE Hospitals.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- How Digital Stress and eHealth Literacy Relate to Missed Nursing Care and Willingness to Use AI Decision Support.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the status and influencing factors of nurses' digital health literacy: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Digital health literacy in medical education: a scoping review of current challenges and development strategies.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Digital Technologies in Cardiac Rehabilitation for High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients: A Narrative Review of Mobile Health, Virtual Reality, Exergaming and Virtual Education.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Hearing health professionals' attitudes and perceived skills toward artificial intelligence.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The imperative of digital competence in healthcare professionals: comparison between the North and South of Europe.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Person-centered hospital care in Indonesia: the role of digital health competency, user interface quality, and user experience in a multi-hospital study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Mapping digital public health training: are we preparing the European workforce?Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- A nomogram for predicting oral frailty in older adults: a small-sample cross-sectional study in Anhui Province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Determinants of digital health literacy among health professionals: Evidence from public and private hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- eHealth Literacy and Knowledge of Social Health Financing Among Undergraduate Healthcare Students in Kenya.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Neonatal nurses' e-health literacy and technology‑mediated clinical practice: a cross-sectional analysis of digital health competencies and practice patterns.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of the Digital Health Literacy Questionnaire for Stroke Survivors: Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundeHealth literacy is a key concept in the implementation of eHealth resources. However, most eHealth literacy definitions and frameworks are designed from the perceptive of the individual receiving eHealth care, which do not include health care providers' eHealth literacy or acceptance of delivering eHealth resources.
aimsTo identify existing research on eHealth literacy domains and measurements and identify eHealth literacy scores and associated factors among hospital health care providers.
methodsThis systematic review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist. A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, PEDro, AMED and Web of Science. Quantitative studies assessing eHealth literacy with original research, targeting hospital health care providers were included. Three eHealth literacy domains based on the eHealth literacy framework were defined a priori; (1) Individual eHealth literacy, (2) Interaction with the eHealth system, and (3) Access to the system. Pairs of authors independently assessed eligibility, appraised methodological quality and extracted data.
resultsFourteen publications, of which twelve publications were conducted in non-Western countries, were included. In total, 3,666 health care providers within eleven different professions were included, with nurses being the largest group. Nine of the included studies used the eHealth literacy scale (eHEALS) to measure eHealth literacy, representing the domain of individual eHealth literacy. A minority of the studies covered domains such as interaction with the eHealth system and access to the system. The mean eHEALS score in the studies ranged from 27.8 to 31.7 (8-40), indicating a higher eHealth literacy. One study reported desirable eHealth literacy based on the Digital Health Literacy Instrument. Another study reported a relatively high score on the Staff eHealth literacy questionnaire. eHealth literacy was associated with socio-demographic factors, experience of technology, health behaviour and work-related factors.
conclusionsHealth care providers have good individual eHealth literacy. However, more research is needed on the eHealth literacy domains dependent on interaction with the eHealth system and access to the system. Furthermore, most studies were conducted in Eastern and Central-Africa, and more research is thus needed in a Western context.
trial registrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022363039).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.