Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37875872›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2023

A comparative assessment of color stability among various commercial resin composites.

M B Uctasli, Sufyan Garoushi, M Uctasli, P K Vallittu, L Lassila

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06463574 (Evaluation of Micro -Tensile Bond Strength to Dentin and Color Stability of a New Self Adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorative Material After Aging), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06463574 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Micro -Tensile Bond Strength to Dentin and Color Stability of a New Self Adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorative Material After Aging

TypeinterventionalSponsorMinia UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsTooth DecayArmsself-adhesive resin restoration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M B UctasliDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey.
Sufyan GaroushiDepartment of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterial Center - TCBC Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. sufgar@utu.fi.
M UctasliDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey.
P K VallittuDepartment of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterial Center - TCBC Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
L LassilaDepartment of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterial Center - TCBC Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim was to evaluate the color stability of six commercial restorative resin composites after being exposed to commonly consumed beverages. Repolishing impact on the stained composite was also assessed.

methodsOne-hundred and fifty disc specimens (8 mm diameter & 3 mm thickness) were prepared from Filtek™ Universal Restorative, SDR flow+, everX Flow, G-ænial A'CHORD, G-ænial Universal Flo and G-ænial Universal Injectable. To assess the color stability in five various beverages, 25 specimens from each material were randomly distributed into five groups (n = 5), according to the utilized staining solution. Group 1: distilled water, Group 2: coffee, Group 3: red wine, Group 4: energy drink, Group 5: coke. The color changes (∆E) for all materials were measured using spectrophotometer at the baseline, after 84 days of staining and after repolishing. Data was collected and analyzed using ANOVA (α = 0.05).

resultsBoth material type and staining solution had a significant effect on the color stability of specimens (p < 0.05). Compared to other beverages, the color value of the specimens submerged in coffee and wine showed the most statistically significant (p < 0.05) mean ∆E. SDR flow + in coffee and wine presented the highest ∆E when compared to other tested materials (p < 0.05). After staining of the composites, repolishing was successful in lowering the ∆E value.

conclusionsAll the beverages had an impact on the color stability of the tested resin composites, with coffee and wine demonstrating the most significant effects. The variations in color stability varied depending on the specific material utilized. Dentists should possess awareness regarding the chemical interactions that occur between different beverages and various types of resin composites. Additionally, repolishing serves as an effective technique for eliminating surface discoloration in composite restorations.

Indexed as

CoffeeWineBeveragesColorComposite ResinsDental MaterialsHumansMaterials TestingSpectrophotometrySurface PropertiesCoffeeComposite ResinsDental MaterialsCoffeeColor stabilityEverX FlowRepolishingResin compositeSDR flow+

Identifiers

PMID37875872
PMCPMC10598901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.