ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2024
Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Complications After Liver Transplantation Based on Transfer Learning.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Liver transplantation is one of the most effective treatments for acute liver failure, cirrhosis, and even liver cancer. The prediction of postoperative complications is of great significance for liver transplantation. However, the existing prediction methods based on traditional machine learning are often unavailable or unreliable due to the insufficient amount of real liver transplantation data. Therefore, we propose a new framework to increase the accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis of complications after liver transplantation with transfer learning, which can handle small-scale but high-dimensional data problems. Furthermore, since data samples are often high dimensional in the real world, capturing key features that influence postoperative complications can help make the correct diagnosis for patients. So, we also introduce the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method into our framework for exploring the key features of postoperative complications. We used data obtained from 425 patients with 456 features in our experiments. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms all compared baseline methods in predicting postoperative complications. In our work, the average precision, the mean recall, and the mean F1 score reach 91.22%, 91.70%, and 91.18%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.